1

I was helping my dad install Alumiconn pigtails in his home when I spotted something weird in a 1-gang outlet box: a black wire shorted with a white wire. Alarm bells went off in my head, so I spent the next couple of hours researching and trying to figure out which wires went where.

I discovered that a nearby switch had a black wire coming in and a white wire coming out and proceeding to that same panel. I also discovered that the source white and black wires coming in to the 1-gang outlet box were both hot and indeed shorted with each other when 2 of the switches on that nearby switch panel were on.

Here is a diagram of what the wiring looked like before: enter image description here

It seems to me as though the electrician that installed this wiring was trying to control the hallway lights and the exterior garage lights with separate switches. My dad had commented earlier that the exterior garage lights never seemed to work correctly.

I decided that I wasn't happy with this wiring, so I redid it to look like this: enter image description here (The switch panel had existing copper pigtails that I left, but I plan to go back and install 2-port Alumiconns for each switch.)

Unfortunately the hallway lights and the exterior garage lights are now controlled by the same switch, and the outlet is only on when the lights are on, but at least it all works now and I'm not crossing any white wires with black wires.

Two questions:

  1. Was it wrong before, and is it right now?

  2. If I wanted to have the outlet always on and the lights controlled separately, I believe I would need to run two additional hot conductors from the switch panel to the 1-gang box (or otherwise re-run the wiring to the outlets and the lights). Is this correct?

3
  • 1
    It looks an awful lot like the last guy wanted 2 switched hots but only a /2 cable was installed... so he bootlegged neutral using the ground wire. Common if shameful. The problem is, what you have there needs more like /4 cable. I would rethink the whole deal using smart switches, particularly smart 3ways, with the "master" 3ways in the garage. Commented Mar 18, 2019 at 5:06
  • I want to do the least amount of work possible, and I really want to avoid putting in another box somewhere. You mentioned needing /4 cable. That's kind of what I was getting at in my 2nd question. Could I fix this by running two additional hot conductors from the switch panel to the outlet box? Then I could have one hot connect to the outlet, and the two switched hots could bypass the outlet and go to the lights without having to rewire them. How easy is it to pull additional conductors? I've never tried that before.
    – ikefalcon
    Commented Mar 18, 2019 at 5:24
  • How hard it is to run additional conductors depends on how things were installed @ikefalcon -- normally, you'd have to run a replacement cable... Commented Mar 18, 2019 at 11:45

2 Answers 2

1

You don't need to put in another box somewhere, but if you want the lights controlled separately and the outlet always on, you will need to run another cable from the switch box to the outlet box.

The new cable does not have to physically follow the existing cable, it just has to connect the same two junction boxes.

You can't just add a /2 cable and use both wires as switched hots with return via the neutral wire in the existing cable. Electrical codes and safety considerations require that all current that flows through a hot wire to a load must return via a neutral wire in the same cable.

You can either abandon or remove the existing /2 cable and replace it with a /4 cable, or keep the /2 and add a /3 cable.

If you install a /4 cable, the wiring is simple. You have one neutral, a constant hot, and two switched hots. Three loads use one hot each, and they all share the one neutral.

If you add a /3 cable then it is vital that you keep the two cables completely independent, so that one of the three loads is connected only to the hot and neutral in the /2 cable, and the other two loads are connected to the two hots and the one neutral in the new /3 cable.

1

You still have a problem.

The earlier diagram only worked because somewhere else, neutral and ground were shorted together. So, in the garage, neutral and ground were effectively the same thing, and all current used in the garage was returning via that bootlegged neutral-ground bond. This is very bad. You must hunt that down and kill it, because it creates a hazard even after you correct the white-wire misuse.

I see 4 Code-legal ways to do this, and it's really a question of what's easier.

  • You can run /4 or /2/2 cable to replace the /2 cable. /4 is a pain to source, though. The particulars are described in someone else's answer.

  • You run /3 cable to replace the /2 cable. The /3 black powers one light, the red powers the other light, the neutral is common to both lights. In this case, you hang the receptacle off one light or the other.

  • You run /3 cable in addition to the /2 cable. In this case, the lights are wired the same, but the /2 becomes always-hot and neutral, and those two wires go to the receptacle ONLY. That neutral is used for nothing else!!!! This makes the receptacle hot all the time, which is awesome for a future garage door opener!

  • You lay conduit where the /2 was, and run any needed wires therein. At that point, sky's the limit.

I don't like any of the above because I am afraid to bust out drywall and other wall finishes.

  • My preferred solution is smart switches.

Smart switch solution

I know you aren't looking for in-garage switches, but the "master" smart switch (the one that actually does the switching) needs to be in the garage. That allows us to bring over only always-hot and neutral, which is possible with the existing cable. If you can find a smart "module" that does the same thing without a switch and maybe lives inside the lamp rose, that is fine.

Each "master" smart switch makes 3 connections: to always-hot, neutral and the load/switched-hot to its light.

The "remote" smart switches are then installed inside the house, and "paired" with the respective masters. So you now have a total of 3 switches in the house (patio light, remote for garage light, remote for hallway light). These "remotes" only attach to "always-hot" and "neutral", and use powerline signaling to talk to the masters. So we're talking a smart-switch which does that, such as Insteon.

In the garage, we have a 1-gang space for the receptacle. We need 3 gang spaces (unless modules will be used): 1 for GFCI receptacle (unless otherwise protected), and two switch masters. All these are fat and bulky.

If it's just handy-boxes nailed to unfinished walls, then hit the electrical supply and get a 4-11/16" square box (cheaper at electrical supply), an appropriate mud ring for 2 smart switches, a deep 1-gang handy-box, and a conduit nipple for connecting the two.

If it's finished walls, then get some Wiremold style surface conduit: a "starter box" goes right over top of the existing receptacle, then a nipple or short conduit run over to either a deep 2-gang or two 1-gang's. Remember these switches and GFCI receptacles are bulky.

Then you just wire it all up: hot, neutral and ground to receptacle and both smart switches, and LOAD outputs of both smart switches to their respective lamps.

Lastly you change the wiring in the house so always-hot and neutral go to both smart remotes and also the /2 cable to the garage.

2
  • Can you suggest any techniques to find the short between ground and neutral? I did not observe this in the switch box or the outlet box. I suppose that means it must have been done at the light?
    – ikefalcon
    Commented Mar 21, 2019 at 6:03
  • @ikefalcon yeah there's no substitute for just checking every box in the vicinity, especially after seeing bad work like this, you're likely to find more. Once I found a dehumidifer with a warm plug. It was #12 stranded THHN shoved into a backstab. I opened up every outlet in 3 rooms looking for anything else like that. Commented Mar 21, 2019 at 15:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.