2

I want to purchase new 8-9 units of air-conditioning for my new house. For the hall, kitchen and all the bedrooms.

Some people say inverter air-conditioning is only suitable if you are using more than 8 hours per day. Then only it saves energy.

I am aware that when you switch the air-conditioning is best to set the temperature at 24 or 25 degree Celsius. Not at 16 degree Celsius. Because the compressor will work at full capacity.

Let's say in my new house I set the temp at 24-25 degree Celsius. But if don't use it often. Use less than 8 hours per day.

My question is it worth it to buy inverter air-conditioning ?

Second question is inverter air-conditioning the future technology for HVAC? If yes then maybe I should invest in one.

  • 8-9 separate units? You live in a mansion without any ductwork? – iLikeDirt Jul 23 '14 at 23:37
  • More likely a rambling old (New England?) house with baseboard heat. Not that the user has a location entered, but hot air heat, and thus ductwork, are still not the norm in these parts. May well be the case in other parts of the world/country as well. – Ecnerwal Jul 24 '14 at 2:13
  • I live in malaysia..is a semi-d house – user23961 Jul 25 '14 at 17:22
3

Rather than focussing on how it's done (inverter drive) focus on what it does (variable speed compressor)

Essentially, the variable speed allows the compressor speed to match the cooling load, so rather than a fixed speed compressor starting, cooling, stopping, starting, cooling, stopping a variable speed model can simply adjust its speed to match the cooling load, while running continuously (until there is no cooling load, or one below the minimum speed it can run efficiently, anyway.)

That has several potential benefits - one is that starting the compressor motor takes considerably more power than running it - so many starts and stops add up - this (alone) might be what someone who says "they only save power over 8 hours or more" is speaking of. However, I think any such statement is far too general to pay much attention to, given the variations in individual units (I've been considering mini-split heat pumps, and have read a lot of data sheets - some are surprisingly different even for closely related models made by the same factory...)

Additional benefits are that rather than the system blowing air that's cold, and then stopping, it blows air that's cool, all the time. Among other things, this improves dehumidification performance and is also usually more comfortable.

You state that you use your air conditioning less than 8 hours per day - but how many days a year? It is true that if the initial cost of something you use rarely is much higher then the payback for any more efficiency (from a unit costing more) is very long (and may exceed the useful life of the product, in some cases.) However, that is not something that is amenable to analysis from afar, and will vary with the initial cost, the energy cost, the use, the climate...

If your cooling needs are limited, and the cost differential is high, just look for the best efficiency among the lower cost type units, and don't worry too much about "the future of HVAC" if having it does not make personal economic sense for you. Something better may be invented before this air conditioner wears out...

Of course, if you are buying 9 of the things, you should at least consider a central system. But that may not pay off in a reasonable time, either.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.