2

I am wanting to install a breaker box inside of a house addition and the box I bought has a 100 amp main breaker for cut off. I'm only going to be pulling around 4500 to 5000 watts at the most so I was wondering if I could run 10/3 UF wire and still use the 100 amp main breaker? I read on other forums a 30 amp main breaker could used.

  • What type of breakers does your subpanel (new breaker box) take? – ThreePhaseEel Jul 24 '16 at 19:38
  • This box is an Eaton 100 amp it came with six 20 amp breakers – tommy_boy Jul 24 '16 at 20:08
  • Is it type CH or type BR? – ThreePhaseEel Jul 24 '16 at 20:23
  • It is an Eaton BR box 100 amp – tommy_boy Jul 24 '16 at 20:38
  • 1
    So I should do away with the 100 amp breaker for the main (feed) and install a 30 amp instead? – tommy_boy Jul 25 '16 at 12:38
3

For a subpanel application -- what you can do is pull the main breaker out of the panel and use a set of main lugs instead, as the panel disconnect is provided by the upstream feeder breaker (which will be a 30A unit given that your feeder is a 30A feeder). In particular, since the 100A MCB BR panels use a backfed type BR main breaker, you can simply pull the main breaker out and replace it with a BRSF125 main lug kit.

Of course, if you want a single disconnecting means at the subpanel, you can leave the main breaker in there and use it as a disconnect switch.

  • 1
    I'm not sure you'd have to pull the main breaker, as long as the feeder is protected by a 30 ampere breaker in the main panel. The 100 ampere main breaker in the second panel, would simply be serving as a means of disconnect. The 30 ampere breaker protects the feeder, the 100 ampere breaker protects the panel, and each individual branch breaker protects the branch circuit wiring. Though the lug kit is a good option. – Tester101 Jul 24 '16 at 22:25
  • 1
    No reason at all to pull out the main breaker, even if it's not needed. The only reason I personally would do it is to have another new BR2100 breaker on the truck to sell. – Speedy Petey Jul 25 '16 at 1:15
3

Breakers protect wires and receptacles. The wiring from the main panel to the subpanel must be protected by a breaker. It must be in the main panel, otherwise it can't protect the wire run! In other words: if the main-sub run is 10 AWG, it must be protected by a 30A breaker in the main panel.

The "main" breaker in the sub-panel is redundant/irrelevant and can be of any value. It is effectively just a local shut-off switch. You don't even need one, but you might get a better deal buying a panel/breaker combo intended to be a main panel. There's no difference, except ground and neutral must be isolated separately in a sub-panel.

If you don't have 2 spare spaces in the main panel, look for quadriplex breakers (possibly without the outer handle tie).

enter image description here

-1

It's unfortunate you've already bought the 100A breaker, but NO. The breaker is there primarily to protect the wires, and only secondarily to protect the loads. A 100A breaker will not protect 10AWG wire adequately. Said differently, 10AWG is grossly undersized for 100A breaker.

You have two options: replace the 100A breaker with a 30A breaker and use the 10/3 UF cable, or keep the 100A breaker and install 3/3 UF instead. Installing 3/3 is no picnic (it's very stiff), and will likely cost more than a 30A breaker, but is definitely more "future proof" if you feel there will be more loads added to the subpanel (like electric floor heating, a stove, etc.)

  • He's referring to the main breaker in the subpanel, not the feeder breaker in the main panel – ThreePhaseEel Jul 24 '16 at 19:38
  • I was hoping the 100 amp main would work with the 10/3 wire so I wouldn't have to buy the 30 amp – tommy_boy Jul 24 '16 at 20:10
  • The main breaker in the second panel is protecting the panel, not the feeder supplying the panel. – Tester101 Jul 24 '16 at 22:28
  • 3
    @AndyW, your last reply is the only accurate one. The 100A breaker would not be "protecting" anything. It would simply be acting as a means of disconnect. – Speedy Petey Jul 25 '16 at 1:17
  • 1
    With few exceptions, article 240 of the NEC requires conductors to be protected from overcurrents at the supply end "240.21 Location in Circuit. Overcurrent protection shall be provided in each ungrounded circuit conductor and shall be located at the point where the conductors receive their supply except as specified in 240.21(A) through (H)" – ArchonOSX Jul 27 '16 at 10:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.