I am planning to add Ethernet wiring to my house (semi-detached three-storey town house). I will be using this network to connect several (4-6) computers together in a typical (geek) home setting.

I have worked out the topology and most of the components, but there is one I am stuck on: the sockets. The quote I received from the electrician includes Cat 7 cables (probably overkill, but the difference in price to Cat 6 was minimal) and Cat 5 (RJ-45) sockets. I have a fairly good handle on Cat 5 / 6 / 7 cables, but the sockets have me stumped:

  • What does the Category (Cat) of an Ethernet socket signify?
  • If I connect Cat 5 sockets to Cat 7 cables, will I be limited to "Cat 5" speeds? Is the difference even likely to be noticeable in a home network?
  • My electrician claims that Cat 6 or Cat 7 sockets are very rare and almost never used. Is this the case? Some Googling has turned up the GG45 socket, which seems to be a backwards-compatible (with RJ-45) socket for Cat 7 cables - is this what I should be looking for? Or can I replace my Cat 5 sockets with Cat 7 sockets at a later date?

I'm still trying to get my head around this, so I apologise for the somewhat confusing questions, and would be most grateful if anyone can point me onto the correct path!


Cat7 connectors are compatible with Cat5, with enhancements and caveats

Cat5, Cat5e, Cat6 and Cat7 are physically and electrically compatible. It's when you try to do 10Gb/s or higher signaling on the cable that the Cat5e standard falls over.

The physical connectors for Cat6 and Cat7 cables are still RJ45 plugs, but they're shielded and the standard calls for much less untwisting at the ends of the cable in the connectors than what is permissible for Cat5e. It's "harder" to do a proper Cat6 or Cat7 termination.

Aside from the wire twist requirements, in order for shielded connectors to work as designed, the grounding conductor in the cable has to be permanently in contact with the metal shield on the plug or jack when it is connected to the cable. You'll also see shielded Cat5e in installations like outdoor radio connections. Properly shielded cables also open up a whole new realm of potential issues like ground loop interference, so all of your equipment needs to be properly grounded, as well.


Anyhow... if you connect your Cat7 cable to Cat5e jacks, presuming your Cat5e jacks let you jam the thicker Cat7 wires in (which they almost certainly will), you can expect Cat5e performance. Cat5e performance is 1000 Mb/s (Gigabit Ethernet, or about 125 Megabytes per second). I wouldn't expect Cat6 performance out of that configuration (which would be 10 Gb/s, or about 1.2 Gigabytes per second).

Just for reference, if you have a mechanical hard drive in your computer, it's going to struggle to push more than 120 Megabytes per second. Gigabit Ethernet is every bit as fast as your internal hard drive throughput. If you have an SSD, you may see 500 Megabytes per second, which is "faster" than Gigabit Ethernet. With the right switch, you can aggregate ports to create a 2 Gb/s, 3Gb/s, 4Gb/s or faster channel.

Personally, I would run at least 2 Cat7 cables to every room.

10Gbps Ethernet still costs over $100 per port right now, which is expensive for home use (you could get an 8 port 10Gbps switch for about $850).

It's unlikely that you need bigger bandwidth at your house than what Gigabit Ethernet provides today. On the other hand, I'd check the cost of Cat6 or Cat7 jacks and if you can bear the extra cost, have those installed instead of the Cat5e jacks.

Bear in mind that if your installer doesn't terminate those Cat6 or Cat7 jacks correctly (properly bonding the grounding conductor in the cable to the shielding, wire twist rules, etc.), then they aren't really Cat6/7 jacks, anyway. Your installer might know this, and might not want to go to the extra trouble if terminating those cables in full compliance with the standard.

Future of copper Ethernet

By the way, copper network cable has plenty of life ahead of it, out to 50 Gb/s or 100 Gb/s (well over 10 Gigabytes per second), depending on the standard and the cable. Ethernet over optical fiber follows essentially the same roadmap--same speeds--running out for several years, then jumps to bandwidth like 400Gb/s and higher. Who knows if copper will continue to support those kinds of speeds. But are you really worried about being able to move so much data around your home network that 50Gb/s or 100Gb/s couldn't meet your needs? So you can install fiber if you really want to, but you're going to pay a lot more for every port for a zero or negligible benefit if you go that route.

Having said all that, I actually do strongly agree with the notion of running conduit so that you can pull new cable later. Because who knows what's really coming a few years out? One reasonable way to do this is to run the conduits straight up the wall channel from the wall boxes into the attic. You can pull cable straight up into the attic, then run it through the attic suspended from the roof trusses or even strung across the joists.

But in terms of future-proofing, take a look at the Ethernet Roadmap document from the Ethernet Alliance.

  • $1,0000 per port? You can get a 24-port 10gbps ethernet switch for under $3K, e.g. $150 per port max. Still expensive, of course, but not even close to what you said. Also, what you said about port aggregation is a bit misleading. Yes, you can aggregate several ports, but any one stream will still be limited by one port, so if, say, you're copying files, you'll still be limited by 1Gbps connection even if you aggregated 2 of them. – haimg Mar 8 '16 at 0:37
  • Yeah, typo--corrected. Link aggregation is for increased bandwidth and decreased contention. For one thing, you wouldn't do link aggregation (probably) from a workstation anyway. You might with a server. But even then, there are examples of software that fork or spin up additional threads and create multiple streams, so it is possible to do file transfers from one machine that will use multiple links simultaneously. Plus, a server is usually servicing multiple independent, concurrent requests and link aggregation is a plus in that scenario. – Craig Mar 12 '16 at 23:56

RJ45 is all Newegg & TigerDirect offer on their Cat7's, so I'd have to say no problem with the old connectors. And, your computers won't take anything else...without a specific expansion card being installed.

Cat & whatever number is just for Category & level speed or data transfer rate, none of that has anything to do with the end connectors. There are a variety of end connectors depending on the equipment they're attached to, you only want something that fits your computers, Router & Modem.

So yes, you can simply clip-off the old connectors & replace them later with GG45, ARJ45 or whatever else the future might have that utilizes your twisted pairs. Your Cat7's do have room for another 2 increases...IF they even happen, copper's on the way out. You'll be happy for a while.

I think Cat7 was a warning to replace everything, just buying everyone a little more time. But, Digital is the future & your planned wires won't do diddly in that future & will need to be replaced entirely with fiber optics, since those can't use any connectors that copper used.

If you see yourself there for 10-years or more. Have the electrician run the cables in conduit so you can drag out the old & slide in the new.

  • Oh, it had a great run. I mean, look at all the lies the Cable Companies got away with ...we can't do more than 1mbps ...3mbps ...5mbps ...10mbps ...20mbps ...50mbps so sign up today for our best offer ever! – Iggy Mar 7 '16 at 19:16
  • 1
    Technology changes. Have a look at the background of DOCSIS (the broadband protocol used for cable company Internet). Before DOCSIS 3.0, transmissions could only use a single channel, and the total bandwidth available in the standard is shared with all of the neighbors connected to the same node. As technology improves and they get more fiber closer to users, they offer higher bandwidth. Also, copper coax broadband is not Ethernet over TP cable. ;-) – Craig Mar 7 '16 at 19:34
  • I think it's important to try not to compare apples and oranges. Metro Gigabit Ethernet is not likely to be delivered to the home (exclusively) over copper because the distances involved are too great. But within a local network (up to 330 feet in any direction from your Ethernet switch), copper is alive and well. The OP is talking about networking within a home, not talking about internetworking over long distances outside the home, which is the use case for things like broadband cable, DSL, FIOS and metro Ethernet. Different context. ;-) – Craig Mar 7 '16 at 19:39
  • I know-I know, it was just an example of the nonsense. Want a trip in the way back machine? I was a DOS baby & only now does the GUI software crap finally meet the "user performance" of a Pentium1. Because of the GUI crap, I still can't get instant (no wait, lag, hesitation AT ALL) anything, though I suspect that's a lie if the Gov't & their buddies weren't snooping everyone & piggybacking everything. – Iggy Mar 7 '16 at 20:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.