We have a 30 year old roof in New England, which we have begun to interview roofers for this spring/summer.

The topic of plywood has come up and 2 have said we definitely need to replace the plywood even if it looks good. As plywood lasts about 30 to 40 years and we run the risk of delamination and required replacement in a few years.

The other two have stated that as long as the plywood is good and stays dry, it can last forever.

At quoted on 55 dollars per 4X8 sheet, its a sizable cost and so I am wondering if the plywood needs to be replaced regardless of current state.

  • 4
    The other two are correct. Wood, in general, has no particular lifespan in and of itself. It all depends on the original quality and whether or not, as they say, it has stayed protected from the elements.
    – DA01
    Feb 9, 2016 at 15:35
  • 1
    Is that plywood gold-plated? I can get a full sheet of 1/2" plywood for half that at one of the big box stores.
    – user4302
    Feb 9, 2016 at 20:16
  • Likely an "installed" price. But it's definitely a profit center...I still consider half that highway robbery, but I haven't really gotten over the "Iraq war plywood price explosion" (where the price went way, way up, and never came down - kinda like airfares with jet fuel prices more recently.
    – Ecnerwal
    Feb 9, 2016 at 20:31
  • 2
    Did the other two quote a cost in case the plywood does need replacing? (Or will they just decide it needs replacing later when you have less choice and give a cost then?) Get basic contingency costs up front when you can. Feb 10, 2016 at 4:43
  • @user2338816 All of them had a quoted price for one sheet of plywood. They all ranged from 40 to 60 dollars, i assume its so pricey due to installation costs and that I live in Massachusetts.
    – treeNinja
    Feb 11, 2016 at 14:19

3 Answers 3


I would give your business to one of the "is good and stays dry" roofers who are not blatantly trying to fleece you.

Now, the other two may be working from the assumption that if you bothered to call a roofer, you have leaks. But they strike me a lying scammers if they are selling you new plywood with no idea if the roof deck is rotten or solid.

Plywood does not have an expiration date.

  • 1
    Thanks that is what I suspected. So no concerns of the glue failing?
    – treeNinja
    Feb 9, 2016 at 15:36
  • No. At least, not unless you can see the glue failing and leading to delamination, particularly at the corners. If this isn't happening, it's fine.
    – iLikeDirt
    Feb 9, 2016 at 15:39
  • 5
    None, if it's kept dry. Do you rip out your subfloor after 30-40 years? Of course not, unless it's the rotten subfloor around the leaky toilet in the bathroom...
    – Ecnerwal
    Feb 9, 2016 at 15:40
  • 1
    @Ecnerwal That's a bad example, since subfloors don't typically endure the extreme temperatures that a roof deck would.
    – Tester101
    Feb 9, 2016 at 17:19
  • 2
    Have some actual research data: woodscience.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/gupta/pdf/… and fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplrp/fplrp543.pdf IF (and that's a big IF for a single-family structure) the plywood happened to be FR treated there evidently is some cause for concern. That type of material would most likely be found on multifamily structures from the early 1980's per a quick scan of these documents. The second indicates a maximum roof temp of 76C but that less than 21 hours per year would be above 71C, which helps inform reading the first.
    – Ecnerwal
    Feb 10, 2016 at 0:25

It's a mistake for the roofers to say that the plywood will definitely have to be replaced. However, they may be familiar with homes in your area, that were built around the same time. So they may have experience, that tells them that the decking will likely have to be replaced. Sometimes in situations like this, contractors will pad the estimate with the cost of replacing the decking. When they do the work, if they don't have to replace the decking they'll remove/refund the cost.

All that being said. I don't know these contractors, and have not talked to them. I can't say for sure what their intentions are.

Comparing plywood used as subflooring, to plywood used as roof decking is a mistake. Roof decking bakes in the sun, freezes in the cold, and may be surrounded by moisture laden (potentially salty ocean) air . While the subfloor rests comfortably in conditioned space (typically).

I'd say guaranteeing that the plywood will need to be replaced, is just as wrong as assuming it won't.

If it were me, I'd bring the concerns right to the contractor. You might find that they have a rational explanation. I'd find out if they plan to simply replace the decking, or if they're going to inspect it first. I'd also ask them if they'll reduce the price, in the case that the plywood is in good shape and doesn't need replacing.

  • Very good points. The environment in the attic is partly what caused me to ask this question. I have had to work up there in all 4 seasons sadly.
    – treeNinja
    Feb 9, 2016 at 22:41
  • @Ecnerwal My main concern would be salty moisture laden air, flowing along the underside of the decking. As I said, I'm not a material science expert. I also don't like to jump to the conclusion that everybody is trying to rip me off.
    – Tester101
    Feb 10, 2016 at 0:54
  • @Ecnerwal I'll jump to the conclusion that air has moisture in it, and be concerned that it could possibly also be salty.
    – Tester101
    Feb 10, 2016 at 1:00

Why not pay a little extra, and have it all replaced? How much of an expert is your roofer, and will he catch all the bad wood? How about the mediocre stuff? There will be some mediocre wood. Will he let that go? It is easier for you to say, "rip it all up", than to take a chance on people you don't know and will never see again. Roofers that say you should replace it all are your best friends, and are not trying to rip you off. Don't be with the industry standard, which advocates cheapness and cost savings. Like roofers, there are many a good carpenters out there with wood in their basement that they will never throw out, only because they were trained to be as economical as possible, and they pass all this common sense down to their clients. If you can afford new wood, then get it, and get those 30 year shingles, too. One thing you don't want is solar power. It is against the law to have batteries hooked up to solar panels, because of the huge waste in landfills down the road. Those with solar are just showoffs. They only get free electric during the day, when the sun is out. Unbelievable.

  • Where are you getting that it's "against the law to have batteries hooked up to solar panels?" Keep in mind that the care and feeding of stationary battery systems is not a newfangled thing, and there are quite a few totally off-grid solar+battery systems in institutional-type applications as well (road sign beacons, weather stations, and so on) May 23, 2019 at 3:04
  • Also, if you're going to rip out and replace a roof, you fail to address several points on that front as well, such as the use of over-vented roof systems vs traditional attic ventilation, as well as providing sufficient ventilation for ice dam control in the traditional model (as the traditional rules of thumb don't cut it), and choice of roof covering (newsflash: if you want your roof to last, you make it out of well-corrosionproofed metal, not asphalt and gravel bits) May 23, 2019 at 3:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.