# 120v vs 240v neutral

I understand that 240v in a house current, the flow is in out/ out in through the two 120v lines from the transformer. What continues to confuse me is the role of the neutral wire in a 120v circuit. If its ac, (and I know it is) then the same sloshing flow as the 240v will take place. So current flows, just as in a 240v circuit, on the first ac pulse. But when current reverses, in a 240v circuit, current simply retraces the path of the preceding current, but on 120v, it seems that there is no push/voltage driving back towards the voltage source from ground.

In a 120/240V system, the neutral is a center tap on a 240 volt transformer secondary coil. So your home is not fed by two 120 volt wires, it's fed by a 3-wire 120/240V single split-phase system.

If it helps, you can think of it as three separate circuits. There's the 240 volt circuit, which flows through the whole secondary coil (L1 to L2). Then there's the first 120 volt circuit, which flows through half of the secondary coil (L1 to neutral). Finally there's the second 120 volt circuit, which flows through the other half of the secondary coil (L2 to neutral).

You might find it easier to think of voltage as a potential or difference rather than a discrete number. Yes, a single live wire has a potential between itself and earth, but the single wire by itself has a potential of 0.

This is why birds can sit on electrical wires without getting a shock - the current needs a return path. It's also the reason why if you have two DC power supplies of different voltages and link their negatives together, the reading across the two positive terminals will be the difference in voltage.

Voltage doesn't "flow in and out", rather you are seeing plus or minus 120V potential to ground. If you were looking at a graph of the voltage, you would see a sine wave at 60hz between +120V and -120V, hence why when you add up the two legs of your service, you get 240v and not 0v.

Unlike three phase power where all three phases from the generator are delivered to your home, in residential systems, you are being fed two "legs" from a transformer on a single phase.

The neutral provides a non-energized path for the electrons to return to ground.

• Is the neutral not a "current carrying conductor" when there is a load? Is it OK to refer to it as "non-energized"? Jan 12, 2016 at 6:15
• confusion still. in a 240v ac circuit, Line 1 gets energy from the transformer and then when current reverses, Line 2 is energized. I also see why no neutal is needed. Current is returned to source. But the 120v circuit still isnt totally clear. Let's say I have an appliance timer connected to Line 1 and the "neutral" leg. So Line 1 gets energized fom the transformer, flows through the timer, but instead of completing the circuit by returning through Line2 (240v), it returns through Neutral (120v). Now the confusion: current now reverses, and it's Line2 that's sending the current. Jan 12, 2016 at 16:11
• But that reverse pulse isnt flowing through the timer, its just returning through Line 1. This is 120v ac so how does the neural leg push current back if it's not an energized leg. Jan 12, 2016 at 16:13
• Current doesn't return to ground in the AC split-phase paradigm. Current returns to neutral. Ground just happens to in the neighborhood because we bonded it to neutral. @Scott power can go either way. Think of a center-tap transformer as 2 transformers bonded. Current can flow through "its own" transformer, or through the entire stack. May 9, 2016 at 8:31