3

A gardener just installed a drip irrigation system in my backyard. He didn't installed the back-flow preventer. When I asked him why, he told me for drip irrigation you don't need the back-flow preventer! His argument was that in drip irrigation, we have to install a pressure reducer so there is no need for a back-flow preventer.

Is he right on his argument?

|improve this question
  • 2
    The pressure reducing valve has nothing to do with a back flow device. Back flow valves prevent contaminated water from entering the potable household water. A pressure reducing valve doesn't function in this manner. – ojait Sep 26 '15 at 3:37
8

I think he is mistaken. A pressure reducing valve is not listed in the code among the approved backflow prevention devices:

2009 Uniform Plumbing Code 603.4.6 Protection From Lawn Sprinklers and Irrigation Systems

603.4.6.1 Potable water supplies to systems having no pumps or connections for pumping equipment, and no chemical injection or provisions for chemical injection, shall be protected from backflow by one of the following devices:

(1) Atmospheric vacuum breaker (2) Pressure vacuum breaker (3) Spill-resistant pressure vacuum breaker (4) Reduced pressure vacuum breaker

|improve this answer
  • 1
    Thanks a lot for your reply. Is Check valve same as Backflow valve? I was trying to see a simplest option which can be installed in the line , but couldn't find one. Any hint are appreciated – David Sep 26 '15 at 3:58
  • 2
    It all depends on what code applies in your jurisdiction. In many jurisdictions including my own, the UPC applies. As you can see, a check valve is not listed as an approved device. In a residential situation an atmospheric vacuum breaker for each zone is often simplest. In a case with many irrigation zones a single pressure vacuum breaker is used, but they require protection against freezing. – user39367 Sep 26 '15 at 4:18
  • 1
    Is this qualify as a backflow preventer amazon.com/gp/product/B000FPDEU8?ref_=cm_cd_al_qh_dp_i – David Sep 26 '15 at 4:36
  • 1
    Yes, the example you selected is a typical residential atmospheric vacuum breaker (AVB). A key point with these is proper installation. They must be installed after the valve, above ground, usually a minimum of 6" above the highest point downstream of the AVB. – user39367 Sep 26 '15 at 5:15
  • 2
    Thanks Cris, I am not much worried about code, but want to do things which make sense. The Gadner have put homedepot.com/p/Rain-Bird-3-4-in-FPT-In-Line-Valve-CP075/…. From the description at home depot site it says you might not need the backflow valve. Am i right on this? – David Sep 26 '15 at 5:28
1

Even if it isn't code were you reside it would be wise to install one for your health. But check the valves that you have installed. Many irrigation valve manufacturer's make back flow valves built into them. It's usually just above the out flow threads on the valve. Or if you shake the valve you should hear it rattle. that is the check valve that allows water to only flow in one direction.

|improve this answer
  • 1
    If the Uniform Plumbing Code applies, then a simple back-check will not suffice. That is also not listed as an approved device. – user39367 Sep 26 '15 at 4:11
1

It is also important to install back-flow preventers to discourage clogging of the drippers. After the irrigation cycle finishes, the volume of the pipe that was full of water will need to be replaced by air or it will collapse at certain points. If there is no 'vacuum breaker' type valve the air will enter the line through the dripper aperture bringing with it dirt and debris. If you want to decrease clogging of drippers and occurrence of dry-spots in the garden, I'd recommend installing such a device at the highest point of each station. If the line is very long, put one every 30 metres or so.

|improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.