I'm installing additional light bulbs in my basement. I have an older house with aluminum wiring.

Can I do this:

[new light bulbs]<--copper-->[old light bulb junction box]<--aluminum-->[main circuit]

Is it safe / does it comply to code ?

  • 5
    You should consider replacing any circuit that has aluminum wire. Over time, it can become a fire hazard. Sep 21, 2015 at 14:05
  • 17
    Don't just splice the two wires together, you need a special connection. When two dissimilar metals touch, a process called galvanic corrosion occurs, causing one of the metals to rust much faster than the other (this is actually used to a positive effect to prevent corrosion in water heaters with a so-called sacrificial anode). Also, the wires will expand/contrast due to heat differently, which will loosen the connection. Sep 21, 2015 at 17:12
  • 1
    In my country having aluminum cabling at all is not considered safe and it is required to replace it at first opportunity. And there are reasons for that. Just so you know.
    – Mołot
    Sep 21, 2015 at 22:10
  • 5
    @Tester101: Relating to old aluminum wiring: nachi.org/aluminum-wiring.htm According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), "Homes wired with aluminum wire manufactured before 1972 ['old technology' aluminum wire] are 55 times more likely to have one or more connections reach "Fire Hazard Conditions" than is a home wired with copper." Sep 22, 2015 at 0:16
  • 4
    @Tester101 Wikipedia: Aluminum wire used before the mid-1970s has a coefficient of expansion that varies significantly from the metals common in devices, outlets, switches, and screws. Many terminations of aluminum wire installed in the 1960s and 1970s continue to operate with no problems. However, problems can develop in the future and some connections were not made properly when installed, including not wrapping wires around terminal screws and inadequate torque on the connection screws. There can also be problems with connections made with too much torque as it causes damage to the wire. Sep 22, 2015 at 14:27

8 Answers 8


Ignoring expensive crimpers, Ideal Twister Al/Cu (purple) wirenuts are NEC compliant. (Your jurisdiction might vary.) They are not for use on aluminum to aluminum connections (which is a little baffling to me, but I digress). You can find some controversy on the net about the safety of these, so read up and decide if they're appropriate for you.

Another compliant option is the King AlumiConn, which can connect both aluminum to copper and aluminum to aluminum. These require a precise torquing of the screw connectors.

Depending on the wire going to your light, you might have to pigtail copper to aluminum in the above manner and then wirenut the new copper to the light.

I've heard people say that a squirt of no-alox in a standard wirenut is fine, but it is not code compliant in my neighborhood. (And probably nowhere.) And it should go without saying that a normal wirenut is absolutely not compliant anywhere.

  • Further reading: nachi.org/aluminum-wiring.htm Sep 21, 2015 at 13:58
  • 4
    Was skeptical of the aluminum-aluminum only connection thing, so called Ideal. They said aluminum-aluminum only is not code, but if you added a copper pigtail (and capped it inside the box) that it was code. Buddy on the phone couldn't provide an explanation, just said that was how it was.
    – User95050
    Sep 21, 2015 at 16:56
  • 2
    Off the top of my head I'd guess the "no aluminum-aluminum" thing has to do with the fact that the thermal coefficient for aluminum is about a third more than copper and maybe makes it possible for a high temperature to damage the nut or a low one to let it fall out if the entire contents of the nut were aluminum. Having half the metal be copper would put less stress on the nut anyway.
    – Perkins
    Sep 21, 2015 at 21:18
  • There are cases where the Ideal #65 purple wire nut (and any normal wire nut with noalox) have failed. There are many documented cases online with photos demonstrating this, as well as many independent studies and field reports, dating back to at least 1995, including the US CPSC. Independent tests show Ideal-65 purple Twist-on connector fails UL 486C Safety Standard despite its UL-listing.
    – TrinitronX
    Dec 6, 2019 at 19:13
  • @Kris quotes the NEC 2014 where twist-on wire connectors are not suitable unless marked AL-CU (intemixed-dry locations). However, Dr. Aronstein's report states the following: "Because of its smaller spring cross section, lack of a surrounding metal sleeve, and because its insulating shell and corrosion inhibitor are easily ignited and relatively free-burning, the Ideal #65 twist-on connector is considered to have a lower certainty of permanent, safe, and complete correction than pigtailing with the Scotchlok twist-on connectors (which in turn ranks below the Amp COPALUM repair)."
    – TrinitronX
    Dec 6, 2019 at 19:53

Straight out of the National Electric Code 2014

Splicing wire connectors are required to be marked for the material of the conductor and for their suitability where intermixed. Splicing wire connectors, such as twist-on wire connectors, are not suitable for splicing aluminum conductors or copper-clad aluminum to copper conductors unless it is so stated and marked as such on the unit container or an information sheet supplied with the unit container. The required marking is “AL-CU (intermixed-dry locations)” where intermixing (direct contact) occurs.

Ref: 110.14 Electrical Connections (B) Splicing


I bought a house with aluminum wiring so I had to educate myself on what was so different. The only way considered safe to connect copper and aluminum is through a splice connector. Specifically, you have to connect the wires individually so they are not prone to corrosion.

The Ideal connectors (purple, for aluminum) are not considered a good fix because all they do is contain a paste that is supposed to help prevent corrosion. This can be deceptive that you've "fixed" the problem and lull you into a false sense of security

The effectiveness of “pigtailing” using twist-on connectors has been evaluated by CPSC staff. In CPSC-sponsored laboratory testing and life tests, substantial numbers of these connectors overheated severely.

What the pigtails fail to address is the other danger of aluminum/copper joining: thermal expansion. The problem here is that wires under load will heat up some. Because copper and aluminum expand at different rates, this allows your pigtails to move some. The wires can work themselves loose inside the nut, creating an arcing situation, and eventually become a fire hazard, as demonstrated by this picture (link defunct)

enter image description here

So why doesn't every copper-to-aluminum pigtail fail like this? Mostly it's because, at lower amps, the wires produce very little heat. As such, you can "whistle past the graveyard" and install these, hoping you never modify the circuit to where the wires can produce enough heat to work themselves loose into an arc fault.

Splicing is the only true safe solution, as it allows the wires to expand at different rates.

I went with the AlumiConn splicing product. (Copalum, the other splice for this situation, is for electricians only, as it requires special tools). They not only splice, they contain anti-oxidant jelly already added. It's relatively easy to find (a local big box and a local electrician store both carry them, although they're pricey) and can be installed as DIY as long as you get the lugs tightened to the torque specs (I bought a torque screwdriver since I had so many to replace). You can use a non-torque method if you want. Also, make sure the wires are actually connected by giving them a tug. I was able to replace several places where previous electricians (and even the previous owner) had simply used regular pigtails and crossed their fingers. So far, they have been very effective in letting me splice copper in.


I came across this while looking for something else. I know that it's an old discussion, but I wanted to leave this for anyone searching in the future.

When I moved back into my house in '05, fortunately little brother, a recent electrician journeyman, was about.

I had a couple of warm sockets.

I'd a '67 or '68 house with aluminum wiring, which was done for a couple of years here in the Las Vegas desert.

So it took almost 40 years for the reactions to be noticeable.

Noticiable, because at some point, the sockets were likely replaced (or was the code fool enough to allow copper sockets back then).

Anyway, we went through replacing sockets and using the purple nuts with the anti-oxidant goo.

Fast forward 10 years, and one stopped working. Pulling the plate, I had a melted purple nut, like the one above. And found that Lowes and Home Depot no longer carry them (banned?). I bought a couple of the even more expensive push-wire connectors and installed.

It was only then that I found that Lowes stocks alr/co sockets! About three and a half bucks each. Four times a regular cu socket, but less expensive than either of the purple mating solutions. (at Home Depot, it appears that they can be ordered. when searching, use "alr" not "aluminum" to find most.)

Also, they seem to either have print on the back saying that they can be used with either aluminum or copper, or be stamped with "alr/cu" on the lower right near the detachable tab.

The only real catch so far is that if someone already mated a copper pigtail with the two aluminum daisy chain connectors, you can't find aluminum wire for the daisy chain.

This is easily solved; just connect one Al wire to each screw, as was likely done in the first place. (they seem to unstable to put two on the same screw.

Do not, for Heaven's sake, try to put an Al and Cu on the same screw!

For two-gang boxes with two sockets, you could use a nut or whatever to join the two Al before attaching the pigtail to a screw (unless you can really get two onto the same screw), and then run a copper pigtail from the other. Or, more easily, Al to the first socket, Cu between them, and Al from the second to continue the daisy chain.

So I'm working my way back through the house, replacing the fifteen year old replacements.


You can find WAGO 273 with contact paste inside from factory, at least my nearby stores have them. Any WAGO have tinned coper core which can be safely connected to both aluminum and copper wires. Contact paste protects from moisture (which can connect wires and they will corrode) and also have some grain material to remove surface oxidation from wire.

Working with aluminum wire requires knowledge of it properties:

  1. it makes galvanic pair with copper and will corrode
  2. it has greater resistance that copper, so same diameter copper and aluminum wires are not equal
  3. it can be broken easily, in fact it depends on alloy of wire, but be aware - some alloys are very weak
  4. under constant pressure it will flow. That's why aluminum wires can't be used in screwed connections - aluminum will flow and connection will increase resistance in time. If you look inside WAGO you will see that they uses spring to apply constant tension to wire and core, to prevent disconnection of wires.
  5. they oxidize on surface, in fact coper wires oxidize too. You can scratch old wire with knife to remove oxid layer and gain access to metal core, that will reduce resistance of contact.
  6. When Al corrodes (oxidizes) in the presence of oxygen (in the air) it forms Al2O3 (aluminum oxide - white powder) which is non-conductive. In contrast, copper oxidizes in the presence of O2 to form various compounds (depending on the exact chemistry), which are conductive. This is one of the reasons copper connections are more reliable over time, and do not require a corrosion inhibitor (such as NoOx). Even when copper corrodes, the flow of electricity is typically unaffected.

Be aware of that properties and you can safely get rid of handle aluminum wires.


The aluminum issue is an interesting one.

In part because you need to not only understand the problems that occur in aluminum connections, but also how code is handled.

Problems with aluminum wire arise in Al-to-cu splices, aluminum-to-device connections and al-to-al splices probably in that order greatest-to-least.

The National Electric Code dictates that products are used in their listed capacity and only so. Further, if the product is "listed" that doesn't mean you may use it, as the "Authority Having Jurisdiction" will have the final say.

The Ideal purple wire-nuts are listed, and must be used according to the products instructions. Some of the failures arise from placing to many conductors in the unit. I'd say to hire an electrician to ensure proper installation and use, but I've seen some over-stuff these connectors, among other issues.

The alumiconn connector is the best middle-of-the road option. You would need a torque-screwdriver.

Finally, there is copalum which is by far the best process, but you have to be a licensed electrician, factory trained and have the crimp tool leased to you (They do this to prevent improper installations)

Hiring a professional: I'm seeing the aluminum wiring issue come up more and more during home-sales. Lenders and insurance companies are requiring the wire to be remediated by a Licensed Professional, and receiving a signed letter including the contractor's name, their license and other pertinent information.

I mention this because if you try to DIY this, you may get stuck hiring someone such as myself to come and verify that it's correct. If I were to receive such a request, I would have to inspect every device and it would take me nearly as long as doing the remediation.

  • 1
    Is this lending/insurance requirement true for all aluminum wire, or only "old technology" AA-1350 (which is where the problems lie)? Mar 13, 2017 at 4:07

Stuff like splicing connectors or push wire connectors are for that purpose. Both solve the problem of connecting two different metals which normally cannot be done directly. You need to apply special contact paste to aluminum wires before inserting them into connector. (Another source.) The two types somewhat differ in usage.

Splicing connectors are more expensive but can be easily used also with stranded wires or braided wires. Latter ones are cheaper and are suitable only for solid wires.

  • 1
    Your answer doesn't address the issues specific to aluminum and mixed wiring situations.
    – Random832
    Sep 21, 2015 at 21:02
  • @Random832 – please help me understand what type of information should I add to the answer so it would fulfill the expectation. Because I thought if the OP will read my answer and apply it, he will get the problem solved.
    – miroxlav
    Sep 21, 2015 at 21:14
  • The issue is that most ways of connecting copper to aluminum are not safe due to corrosion issues. None of the products you've linked seem to be marketed specifically for copper-aluminum connections.
    – Random832
    Sep 21, 2015 at 21:17
  • @Random832 – I know about that. The wires do not touch inside the connectors and people around told me they are solving excatly that problem with copper-aluminium connections. I haven't verified it from additional sources, because they have quite high reputation – but well, I can...
    – miroxlav
    Sep 21, 2015 at 21:23
  • 1
    I'd be concerned that the conductors inside the connectors are copper or some copper-based alloy that would have the same problem unless it was specifically marked as being safe for this application. I was able to find Wago does have a page noting how to use their product for solid aluminum wires: global.wago.com/en/services/standards-regulations/…
    – Random832
    Sep 21, 2015 at 21:26

I know this is a very very old post, but I thought it was important to explain the reason behind the marrett failing in the picture so people that find this via google images dont jump to conclusions. This was installer error, as you can see there was no PRE-TWISTING of the wires to ensure a secure connection. The issue here was a loose connection, leading to arcing, which melted the marrett. I work for insurance companies and see this all the time.


  • Are you referring only to Al/Cu wirenuts here? Or to the Cu/Cu types as well? May 10, 2020 at 2:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.