Is it possible for someone to unlock your front door get into your house and then lock the door again without being supplied with a key?

3 Answers 3


Yes, locks can be picked, or bump keys can be used. There's no difference in using these tools to unlock vs re-lock a lock.

  • So someone can break into your home without there being any evidence of a break-in?
    – Debbie
    Commented Dec 6, 2013 at 21:26
  • 3
    Anything's possible.
    – BMitch
    Commented Dec 6, 2013 at 21:27
  • How can I secure my front door then? The lock I have is high security, is quotes that it cannot be picked, bumped or drilled. Is there a lock that definitely cannot be unlocked and re locked without the key?
    – Debbie
    Commented Dec 6, 2013 at 21:35
  • 2
    It's all about time involved, when meeting an "unpickable lock", brick through a window is very fast. What is your defense in depth? How do you prevent alternate route intrusion? Commented Dec 6, 2013 at 21:42
  • 1
    There's also a difference between deterring, preventing and detecting entry or theft. It all depends on what you're trying to do accomplish, how much risk you're willing to take and how much money it's worth to you. In terms of theft, insurance is one way to shift the risk (at a cost, of course) to another entity, so long as you and the insurer can agree on a monetary value of what you're protecting (which maybe difficult for priceless family heirlooms, etc). Even the "best" lock only deters slightly, does a mediocore and easily-bypassed job at protection, and nothing for detection.
    – gregmac
    Commented Dec 6, 2013 at 22:08

There is no such thing as perfect security. If there was, it would have infinite cost.

What you want is security that is Good Enough. For most folks, that can be defined as "just a bit better than your neighbors, so the burglar bothers them instead." Remember that the burglar generally isn't targeting you in particular; they want to minimize risk of being seen and caught, and they're not going to spend more time visibly trying to break in than they absolutely must.

So: A good (not necessarily great) lock, reasonably (not necessarily perfectly) resistant to common modes of attack, mounted well on a strong door in a strong frame (kick-in is more of a real-world risk than picking). Deadbolt with a 1" throw, again well mounted. Door that is very visible from the street, and ideally well-lit, so anyone playing with it will feel exposed.

Also consider the security of your back door, basement door, and windows. Basically, any way that your teenage kid might try to sneak in or out after curfew is a way that a burglar might try to sneak in. Make sure hedges are trimmed back, don't leave ladders outside and unsecured, et cetera.

Next step after that would be alarms. For most people, in most cases, I'm convinced an alarm is more trouble than it's worth; the police now require that alarms be silent with contracted monitoring services in many cities and suburbs because false alarms were unacceptably common.

For most folks, burglar-resistant window grills come after alarms these days, simply because they're ugly... and because they can block escape in case of fire. But they do have their uses.

AFTER considering all of that I'd consider going to highly pick-resistant cylinders... unless your situation has special requirements you haven't told us about. Seriously, most folks who have the patience to learn to pick locks well enough that they might be a danger to you also have the patience to hold down a real job, which will pay a lot better for a lot less risk!

Re Debbie's question, "So someone can break into your home without there being any evidence of a break-in?" ... Maybe. It depends on what you mean by "evidence". In theory, lockpicks leave marks inside locks which an expert can distinguish from those left by normal use of a key. But that certainly isn't something you're going to notice as a homeowner, and not everyone considers "forensic locksmithing" a reliable process. Certainly your insurance company is likely to resist paying unless you can point to some stronger evidence of "forced entry". That gets back to the "good enough" clause; from an insurance point of view you'd actually prefer that they kick the door in or break a window.... or set off an alarm. But selective additional protection of valuables may be a better answer than protecting the whole house. And, again, this is presuming an unusually skilled intruder; most are shake-the-knob smash-and-grab types.

Finally, remember that (a) the best security in the world does no good if you don't use it, and (b) if you think someone is getting into your place on a recurring basis, it is FAR more likely that you're fooling yourself into believing this... even if it's more comfortable to think someone else is taking things or moving them around than to believe you're starting to suffer a bit of forgetfulness.


Door locks are just a deterrent. If someone wants into your house they will find a way. A bump key is one way, but when they bump your lock, it ruins the cylinder. So they're not opening it the nice way with a spare. They're bumping the pins so they don't need the original keys. Good luck! Maybe try re-keying your locks.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.