I'm currently in the process of replacing the roof of a room. This room was originally a balcony, so has never been part of the main house. The roof that was removed had wood beams with wood strips/planks on top of the beams, and a cement sheet on top of that.

I'm located in Bombay, India, where we get the monsoons. These are basically really, really heavy rains for a few months of the year, approx June through September. So, any roof needs to be pretty effectively waterproof. The roof described above was leaking quite badly and had some problems with mice getting in there, so had to be replaced.

When reconstructing the new ceiling, I left the wooden beams alone, and replaced the wood strips/planks. Then I put a aluminum sheet over that. On top of that goes thin strips of wood, like 1 1/2 inches vs 1 inches in width/thickness as a frame for ceiling clay tiles (I think they are clay). The tiles are quite heavy, so they just get placed into the wooden frame, not attached. Supposedly all the wood is teak, though that is hard to check. To summarize, the structure is:

ceiling tiles
thin wooden frame for clay ceiling tiles
aluminum sheet
wooden strips/planks
wooden beams

Just to be clear, I'm not actually doing any of this; there are people doing it for me. So, I guess this is not really a suitable question for a DIY site. :-)

My question is whether it makes sense to paint the thin wooden pieces of wood that constitute the frame for the tiles for water protection. The people who are doing it for me say it is not necessary, since the wooden tile frame won't come into direct contact with water, as the tiles are on top of it. The underlying wooden frame isn't getting painted either, but that makes more sense to me, since it is under the aluminum. However, the frame for the tiles is closer to potential water exposure.

So, does it make sense to paint wood in such a situation? More generally, how much does painting wood help to protect it from water/moisture in general?

2 Answers 2


I agree with your contractor that it is not necessary.

In fact it would be better if you don't, in my opinion.

If it is not directly exposed to moisture or UV from the sun I would prefer to leave it uncoated so if it does absorb some moisture it will dry out more quickly, prolonging it's life.


You can seal the wood after it is framed. Do you need to? No. Would the framing last longer? Probably. Does it make sense to do this?

  • if you like to spend a little extra money on frivolous things...
  • if you feel like that there is no one monitoring the house during parts of the year. Obviously it had access to moisture because it was a balcony. So maybe a monsoon could hit the room hard and no one is checking on the house for a few months. Maybe this helps the framing last longer after decades of use and many unmonitored monsoons.
  • if this is an indoor/outdoor room
  • Thanks for the feedback. Not sure what you mean by the last point "if this is an indoor/outdoor room". Apr 21, 2013 at 8:26
  • Indoor/outdoor room would mean that it is a room that would have a large opening (double doors or more) that would generally be left open at most times.
    – DMoore
    Apr 21, 2013 at 17:48
  • Ah. No, this room is kept completely closed at all times, and an AC is run in there. Bombay is very hot and humid, and I have a computer setup in there. Apr 21, 2013 at 18:18
  • I would not worry about painting/sealing if it is in the AC.
    – DMoore
    Apr 21, 2013 at 21:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.