Newbie question.

Why is it that there's a bazillion different types of screws? Why can't we just always use one standard screw type? Are there advantages/disadvantages to the different types? Are there times when one type is preferred over another?

Help me understand why there isn't one screw to rule them all.

  • 7
    This makes me wonder if there isn't a rule to screw them all...
    – JYelton
    Commented Apr 5, 2011 at 16:04
  • 1
    I agree, Doug. We should all use Robertson screws. :-)
    – user19474
    Commented Dec 22, 2015 at 19:31
  • 1
    This seems relevant here: xkcd.com/927
    – Johnny
    Commented Oct 1, 2018 at 17:08

7 Answers 7


Shamelessly ripped off from here, looks like the primary reason why we still have "bad" screws (flat head and Phillips) is that the "better" types of screws are simply more difficult/expensive to manufacture:

The reason for the different styles is cost and torque.

The slotted head screws are cheap and easy to make. But they're completely useless for powered screwdrivers and you can't put much torque on the screw without it either slipping out or stripping the head (and marring the surface of whatever you're screwing). [Mad]

Phillips (plus/cross) screws are self-centering, making powered screwdrivers possible. They're somewhat more expensive to produce than slotted-head. They tend to 'cam-out' easily under torque, making it hard to apply much torque. I've heard they were designed that way to prevent overtightning. However, it's not good for exposed fasteners to look stripped.

Robertson-head (square) and allen-head (hexagon/hex) fasteners can handle more torque than phillips-head fasteners, but are more expensive. Because the bottom of the hole is flat (unlike the pointed end of the phillips), there's more contact area and so it's less likely to cam-out. The robertson-head is cheaper than the allen-head, but the allen-head has six points of contact rather than 4, making it less prone to rounding out the hole.

The Torx-head fasteners solve the problem of rounding/stripping by having the flat bottom of the robertson/allen that reduces cam-out, but it has much better contact with the driving bit to prevent stripping the head. The points of the 'star' on the driving bit engage the recesses on the screw at nearly right angles, so it has a very positive contact. Torx is becoming more and more popular because of that, particularly in assembly-line work.

Because they're less likely than a phillips to be damaged when tightening, the allen (internal hex) heads are often used for exposed ('decorative') fasteners on 'some assembly required' furniture. It's also very cheap to make the allen keys, so they usually include one with the fasteners.

  • 2
    Also, allen-head screws on flat-pack buyer-assembled furniture are conducive to having the little plastic covers that snap in. Commented Nov 10, 2010 at 0:47
  • 4
    Historical note: Ford went with Phillips screws because Robertson would not sell him the patent. This resulted in Phillips being the standard for American manufacturing, whereas Robertson is more standard in Canada (at least before NAFTA) Commented Nov 10, 2010 at 15:04
  • 1
    For what it's worth, we used Robertson-head (square bit) wood screws when working with decking, and I was in love. I didn't cam out of them once, they can take a huge load of torque. Also, don't forget some newer power drills have a torque setting on them that disengages the drive before you mess up your nice-looking phillips head. Commented Nov 11, 2010 at 8:22
  • 5
    Robertson (square) and Allen (hexagon) screw heads' strength has nothing to do with the bottom being flat. It is a result of the sides being vertical (as well as the hole being deep). The sides are where the pressure is applied.
    – A.M.
    Commented Jul 10, 2013 at 23:25
  • ""better" types of screws are simply more difficult/expensive to manufacture" ... that and the fact that they are often protected by patents and/or trademarks that may limit the number of users. I love working with torx screws, but the IP issues must drive manufacturers nuts. The entire range of screws I usually use was recently renamed because the trademark owner of "Torx" decided they didn't like the way they were marketing them...
    – Jules
    Commented Jun 29, 2017 at 23:33

First, I really like Eric's answer for practical reasons. But there is another side to screw head diversity: Security.

In the end, it's usually a temporary measure. Once a company invents a new screw, some third party will start selling tools to remove them. But for a time, any new screw design means the only people who can open your parts are "certified" workshops you've given tools to. Personally I see this a lot in electronic equipment, where the original manufacturer wants some aspect of design kept private or doesn't want after-market mods made to things they sell. Nintendo is particularly active in inventing new screws.

Examples of security screws include 3-prong Torx variants, and Allen heads with a raised dot in the middle of the screw head to stop standard Allen wrenches from fitting.

If you'd like to see a much more industrial version, find a car which has been booted and look at the bolt. I've seen circular bolt heads with an off-center circular hollow inside. No shoulders or slots to grab, you have to have a very specific wrench. And, of course, there are security lug nuts for car tires.

  • If all else fails, use a screw extractor. They work even on hardened/toughened screws and bolts. Security nuts for car wheels only require a hammer and cold chisel, just like you use on rounded over heads. Commented Nov 10, 2010 at 4:48
  • 3
    Another example - look at the screws next time you're in a public bathroom stall. They're usually driven in by what looks like a normal flathead, but the "reverse" side is smoothed down so they can't be removed by some unruly teenagers looking to cause mayhem (not that they ever do that...) Commented Nov 11, 2010 at 8:24
  • 3
    One of my favorite hobbies is finding ways to defeat said security screws/bolts. Sometimes a slightly modified tool will do the job; other times brute force is necessary. Always a fun pastime.
    – JYelton
    Commented Apr 4, 2011 at 22:47

I thought it would be useful to include an image/link to some drive types found on screws and bolts (obtained from bontool):


  • 2
    Good list. There are some there I've never even heard of, but there are some missing. Some electrical goods like to use a "security" slotted, which is a raised bit in the middle of the slot. And Apple made news a month ago with their "pentalobe" screws.
    – staticsan
    Commented Apr 5, 2011 at 2:45
  • Where's the triangle head?
    – einpoklum
    Commented Apr 8, 2018 at 11:05
  • @einpoklum It's not an exhaustive list.
    – JYelton
    Commented Apr 8, 2018 at 17:25
  • "Torx - Internal Tamber proof" LOL...
    – FreeMan
    Commented Aug 10, 2022 at 16:52

Flat-head (slotted) screws are often considered the "junk" of screw heads, but one place they are slightly advantageous is wet applications. You can set the slot vertically, so it will drain out, instead of holding water. This can increase the life of the screw and the wood behind it.

It's a very small point, but it's something.

(I saw a boat builder once who liked to use Robertson screws in visible applications, and set them to look like diamonds.)

  • 11
    I like to turn all of my flathead screws on my outlet covers so that they are all straight across. My wife thinks I'm slightly neurotic (she might be right) Commented Nov 11, 2010 at 8:25
  • 1
    +1 for orienting the screws on outlet and light-switch covers. I always look at that detail when I'm in model homes. LOL!
    – Dean Hill
    Commented Dec 13, 2011 at 22:25
  • Looking at @JYelton's answer, I suppose that advantage applies very much to Roberton(square)-slot screws as well, and to Phillips-slot combination screws a bit. The Robertson(square)-slot design would be even better for draining if the square were rotated by 45º.
    – A.M.
    Commented Jul 10, 2013 at 23:32
  • 1
    Do you have any proof of your claim that this makes a difference? I'd say the metal they are made of is infinitely more important than the ability to drain the end which isn't always going to be screwed to a vertical face. Do you have proof that they drain better? Flat heads are inferior in nearly every way in my opinion.
    – hookenz
    Commented Jul 11, 2013 at 1:35

Same reason there different shapes and sizes of screws. It's because there is no single design of screw or screw head which satisfies all requirements. Even when the Phillips design came out there was almost immediate competition from posi-drive and others (most of which have since disappeared) because the Phillips design leaves a lot to be desired, such as the bit rising in the slots when the screw gets tight. Some designs, such as allen heads, have been around a lot longer and for most purposes are very superior but even then, a countersunk allen head of necessity has a rather small socket which creates other problems, such as a tendency to break the keys. Also, allen heads and other socket designs are mostly only used in hardened materials, which resist the tendency of the socket to deform under pressure.

The reason we currently have so (relatively) few mainstream designs of screws is simple practicality. Nobody, merchant or user, wants to stock the massive number of screws we would need to have to use the best possible design for every possible application, so we compromise and use ones that are adequate in the majority of cases.


The full list of reasons (partially based on some other good answers here) seems to be:

  • design improvements (a "good thing" on the road to the world having the best screws)

When people come up with improved designs, those start to get used.

  • network effects (a "bad thing")

Some people will stick with older, inferior designs that have many users, since those will be easier to find and they will already have the screwdrivers and bits for them. Also...

  • economy of scale (a "bad thing")

...gives an advantage to more established designs (even if they are terrible), as production of those will be large-scale and efficient, so new designs (better or worse) will tend to be more expensive.

  • patenting (and other business reasons that have nothing to do with design) (a "bad thing")

As Chris Cudmore points out in a comment to a different answer here, this is the reason Phillips screws are more widespread than Robertson (square) screws, despite Robertson ones being generally better (far more difficult to strip the heads. ...and what was Ford's first choice again? ...exactly.).

  • desire to have some things be tamper-proof (mostly a "bad thing")

Guarding against vandalism (special washroom stall screws) and preventing theft (special car wheel lug nuts) are decent goals, but the motives are not always as good. (Is Apple just trying to protect users against themselves with pentalobe screws, or are there other, worse reasons for them, such as pushing more people back Apple for any repairs?) The tamper-proof requirement is pretty clearly at odds with what most users would want, though, as each variation means another set of screwdrivers or bits someone would need to own to be prepared. Of course the fact that the designers of these screw heads often make money off each screwdriver or bit sold points to that being one reason the screw is out there in the first place.

  • different applications (mostly a "good thing")

To end on a positive note after all of that, the different applications of screws really do leave room for multiple "best" designs. The points about wet applications and applications with small countersink-type heads (which can only fit much smaller bit sizes of the grippier designs) are great.

(Still... We would be much better off if we just started using Robertson screws 99% of the time!)

Actually, triangle heads should be best. They should have the best torque (as long as the sides are vertical), while still being simple to cut (low manufacturing costs). I just looked up whether they exist, though, and apparently they are being used as yet another tamper-proof design.

triangle screw head

  • Nice summation. The triangles are "tamper proof" as neither a Phillips nor flat screw driver will work (the screw drivers most people are able to gain casual access to). With a square drive, a Phillips or flat blade of the correct size will fit into the corners, and still drive the screw.
    – Scivitri
    Commented Jan 6, 2015 at 1:08
  • I don't see why triangle heads should have the best torque. It seems to me it'll be the points that are engaged (or a bit of surface due to deformation) - but not the edges of the triangle; and that, say, a torx driver, would effectively have much more engagement with the screw.
    – einpoklum
    Commented Apr 8, 2018 at 11:08
  • "best torque while still being simple to cut". Also, it would be far more difficult to 'strip' a triangle screw (shear off enough metal to lose the ability to drive the screw), and the amount of torque when stripping happens is the real torque limit.
    – A.M.
    Commented Apr 15, 2018 at 13:53

All good answers provided so far. There are also self-tampering; i.e. security screws (one-way, star-bit, etc) that you'll see in public bathroom or on subway/train cars, buses, etc. These were prevented to keep people from disassembling structures, maliciously.

There is even a specific drive (and material) that wooden boat makers like to use called Frearson flat head wood screws (silicon bronze). They look like Phillip drive but have a deeper recess which prevents cam-out. But the builder still gets style points for using bronze, Phillip-looking screws as opposed to using a square drive.

So to answer your question in a few words: price, style, efficiency and material/durability.

Also makes selling fasteners for a living all that more challenging.. lots to know! 8)

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.