I’m running a new dryer line upstairs with 10/3. I bought 50’ hoping it was enough but alas, I’m short about 3’. I have 20’ of 10/2 leftover from a different project and wondered if I could cut a splice of black wire and slide it into the the 10/2 to effectively make it 10/3. I haven’t tried yet and realize the sheathing may not want to cooperate, but since it’s not too far thought it may work. Is there any reason why this would be unsafe?

  • 3
    +1 for asking the question instead of just doing it and creating a fire hazard. Even though an extra wire wouldn't fit into the sheath, you may have just though "to heck with it, it's only 3 feet, I just run this one wire outside the cable". Which isn't allowed, either, BTW...
    – FreeMan
    Jul 1 at 16:23

2 Answers 2


No, that's not allowed. NEC 300.3.

If you have a location that will remain accessible, you can install a junction box - I would use a 4x4 steel box with cable clamps made for 10/3 - and then do your splice there.

If you haven't cut or installed the wire, you can return it to the big-box store, and then get the right thing for your job.

If your socket is labeled for aluminum wire, you can use #8 or #6 4-wire aluminum, which will take some pain out of the price of wire. There is nothing wrong with aluminum wire at these large sizes.

Note that all fasteners which state a screw torque need to have that torque set with a wrench. That's in Code now, at 110.14. That is because mis-torqued screws are a regular point of failure.

Lastly if you are stuck buying "small spools of wire", that's a procurement problem from buying at big-box stores. Better lumberyards and hardware stores will sell you wire by the foot.

  • 1
    Aluminum for branch circuits may not be allowed by local code. Definitely worth checking first with your local jurisdiction. (Montgomery County, MD is one of those where you can't use aluminum for branch circuits.) Jul 1 at 2:21

As already answered, that would be against code. As to why, the answer, as is often the case, is heat. Any current running through wire produces heat. Multiple wires stuck inside a cable sheath is even worse, which is why at certain sizes the same size wire is rated for more current if loose in a conduit than if inside a cable. Your idea is to stuff another wire inside a cable, which if it would fit (it won't) would make the heat problem even worse. Even in conduit, even if there is plenty of extra space, extra wires (multiple circuits) lower the current carrying capacity (according to code) because of heat.

  • While I'm sure you're correct that this is against code, if the two wires are in parallel then when they are made to share the current ordinarily made to flow through a single wire then the total power dissipated as heat in the wires actually goes down (the power dissipated in a wire segment of resistance R is P = I^2 R, and for constant current I the resistance of two parallel line segments is less than the resistance of just one). Jul 1 at 17:40
  • @KeeleyHoek You are correct that, all else being equal, if you have (for example) a 240V circuit pulling 20A on each leg it will put nothing on the neutral and if it has an imbalance then the difference goes on the neutral - e.g., 20A on one and 18A on the other will put 2A on the neutral, so still 40A @ 120V total - so the total amount of current times wires never exceeds what it would be with a 2 wire circuit. And in fact a number of conduit calculations regarding wires and circuits and current allow for exactly that. But in a cable that now has an extra not designed originally Jul 1 at 17:43
  • to go into that sheath wire, there is simply poorer heat dissipation and therefore a guaranteed problem. Jul 1 at 17:44
  • 1
    @KeeleyHoek — and here you see the difference between code and EE. Jul 1 at 19:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.