Never seen this one before. GFCI receptacle test and reset buttons work normally. However, when a tester is used, the breaker trips instead of the receptacle. The same thing happens on other outlets protected by the GFCI receptacle. Any ideas why?

  • 2
    The tester produced an arc.
    – Hot Licks
    Apr 23, 2022 at 2:42
  • 2
    What make and model is the GFCI tester in question, and what make and model is the AFCI in question? Apr 23, 2022 at 3:22
  • Can you upload a picture of the AFCI breaker? The key question is whether it is only AFCI or actually AFCI + GFCI (or perhaps only GFCI!). Because if it is only AFCI then this behavior is still quite plausible (and OK) but then you still need the GFCI/receptacle for protection in GFCI-required areas (kitchen, bathroom, etc.) But if the breaker includes real GFCI protection then you can remove the GFCI/receptacle (use it where you actually need it) and replace with a plain receptacle and a "GFCI protected" sticker. Apr 24, 2022 at 2:02
  • My Tester AFCI Breakers
    – Matteus
    Apr 24, 2022 at 20:51
  • Definitely not the tester OR the breaker because it works on a different GFI circuit and works perfectly like normal. There is something causing it to trip at the breaker instead of the GFI receptacle. Could be a faulty receptacle I guess. Worth swapping out.
    – Matteus
    Apr 27, 2022 at 0:37

1 Answer 1


The common assumptions is that all GFCIs are receptacles. If an outlet needs to be GFCI protected, and you don't see a funny receptacle with a Test and Reset button, therefore somebody messed up.

Actually that is not true. GFCI is actually a "zone of protection" that can be projected to any section of a circuit. And GFCI devices which do that come in a large variety of packages:

  • GFCI + receptacle of course
  • Standalone GFCI (deadfront)
  • GFCI that is a switch (switch-rated deadfront)
  • GFCI + receptacle combined with a switch
  • GFCI circuit breaker
  • GFCI + AFCI + circuit breaker

In your case, my guess is your breaker is a GFCI breaker. That makes a certain amount of sense, since I gather that receptacle is in a location that needs GFCI protection.

If I am correct, and a "Test" button and markings on the breaker will confirm it, then the GFCI receptacle is entirely redundant and can be replaced with a plain receptacle.

I can't call the person a fool for installing it, because there was in fact a GFCI code violation here. Anytime a receptacle is protected from another location, it must be labeled "GFCI Protected" in some manner not handwritten. See NEC 110.3(B) and instructions 8(C). See also 406.4(D)(2).

Why does the GFCI receptacle's test not trip the GFCI breaker? Because the GFCI receptacle TEST button does not create a genuine ground fault, because it can't count on ground being present. So the GFCI creates a "pseudo" ground fault between "protected zone" hot and supply-side neutral, inducing a differential current. This looks like normal hot-neutral load to the upstream GFCI.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.