There is a large amount of pipe of mixed materials buried on my two-hectare hobby farm by the previous owner. I do not know exactly how much or of what kind. Recently, a large leak appeared as detected by the water meter spinning rapidly which I know it was not doing earlier.
My question is - how to detect a hole in a pipe from the surface?
So far the ideas are - radioactive tracer, dye, air, smoke, and a stethoscope. I will try the stethoscope. The smoke idea sound interesting, but is a larger project that I will try to organize.
My question is not - how to isolate a leak by turning valves on and off, or checking out places where heavy equipment was, and so on. I am looking for a method of physically detecting a leak, which might be under 100 meters of loose rock retaining wall.
I Include below the question as originally posed and some more details.
For the record, if you wish to get more involved.
I have two hectares of hobby farm, most of which is irrigated. Recently, I found that while the irrigation system is off there is still water coming through at about the rate of an open domestic tap or shower. I can shut off the valve to the exterior irrigation, and the flow stops. So, the problem is there and not in the house or gardens.
Note: I greatly appreciate all the efforts from contributors so far and hope that together we can solve this. I will post the pathology if I find out what it is.
With that much water flowing I would have thought that the location of the leak would be obvious. But, I have walked the whole property looking for gushers or swamps and not found any.
How could this much water not be obvious on the surface?
How can this problem be solved short of digging up the entire irrigation system or replacing it?
This feels like it would make an great lateral thinking puzzle, but I don't know the answer yet!
I am wondering about trying colored smoke pumped in with an air compressor.
More details.
I replaced several valves that were jammed open and closed them - but it made no difference. I repaired a small leak discovered through a damp spot on the ground. But it was small and this did not noticeably change the problem flow.
For the record - I am an engineer and computer scientist so, believe me, I have tried all the tree pruning tricks of the trade. Every valve is turned off but the main one - with no luck. I am about to go out and try cutting into pipes and insert new valves so I can shut off other parts of the system.
The reason that naïve tree pruning does not work in this case is - from a computer science point of view - that we have only partial information. We have some of the node and some of the edges but we do not know how they are connected up.
Consider the following - I am going to put a valve in the line that goes past the tap. I wanted to put it in upstream of the tap. When I dug up around the tap it turns out that the line does feed the tap, but just goes past it. The feed for the tap looks like it either goes under 20 meters of retaining wall, or plunged 2 meters down to the lower level.
The soil here was unexpectedly damp - suggesting that something might be happening in the next level up.
More digging showed that the line to the tap goes under the retaining wall, and there is a second line that I did not even suspect that is parallel to it. Again - emphasizing why turning on and off of valves is not a viable process to locate the leak.