I haven't been able to find any information about the strength of a 2 x 6 acting as a joist or rafter when there are holes drilled through it in the middle of the 1.5" dimension, straight through the 5.5" to the other 1.5" face. Most information is about the strength when holes are drilled through the 1.5" dimension...this question is about holes drilled through the 5.5" dimension.

Specifically, I am drilling 5/16" holes every 24" of a 10 foot 2 x 6, and I am curious how this affects the bending strength.

  • 2
    May we be so bold as to ask what you're trying to accomplish?
    – JACK
    Commented May 12, 2021 at 16:38
  • 1
    and what is it that you expect this 2x6 to do once you've perforated it?
    – FreeMan
    Commented May 12, 2021 at 16:44
  • I am putting 1/4" bolts through it so that I have a stud extending past the 2 x 6, so that I can attach a vinyl roof to it. It will be used as a rafter. Commented May 12, 2021 at 16:54
  • There are better ways to accomplish that end, which do not involve through-holes and absurdly long bolts.
    – Ecnerwal
    Commented May 12, 2021 at 17:44
  • 2
    While wood is absurdly expensive these days, you'd be better off buying a 2x8 or 2x10 for your rafter instead of trying to Jerry-rig something on your own with no structural analysis. Especially since rafters tend to be over-head, and, if it fails, on-head.
    – FreeMan
    Commented May 12, 2021 at 18:02

1 Answer 1


The purpose of your construction aside, I'd like to address the strength question.

One way to figure it out is by way of an experiment. Load bearing capacity of a joist or beam is based on material strength, direction of fibres and load, point or distributed loads, fatigue and dynamic & static loads etc..

Putting all this together, a L/360 deflection limit emerges in building construction, which states that lumber of length L can be loaded up to the point it deflects no more than L/360. (Caveat emptor: there are variants to this and lots of discussions as to its merits and applicability).

In your case, where published data is lacking, you could perform a simple test: compare two pieces of 2x6, drill your holes and insert screws into one, and apply a defined load on both. Then determine at which load difference both deflect equally.

That relative load difference for a given deflection around the L/360 value is roughly equal to the relative difference in load bearing capacity.

For a 10 foot piece, the maximum deflection from L/360 is 1/3in. You could simply apply a load until the pristine 2x6 deflects perhaps 1/4 or 1/3in, and determine what (lesser) load is required to deflect the perforated 2x6 by the same amount. If the difference is within say 10% you have little to worry about.

Note that bores with screws inserted will have a different effect from empty bores: the screws restore some of the lost strength in the upper compressed portion of the lumber.

To apply the load you can rest the ends of the 2x6 on stools or chairs, sit on the centre (with a friend), and hang a bucket off the centre which you fill with water, steel weights, rocks etc.. for fine tuning. It may take 300 to 400lbs to reach 1/4in deflection (It's a guess, I haven't tried it). Longer lumber will get you there with less weight but also provide the relative difference you seek. Make sure you prevent the lumber from tipping.

  • This is a very helpful idea, and I think I will try it. Thank you. Why do you think the bores with screws inserted will have a different effect from empty bores? Commented May 13, 2021 at 0:36
  • @user1260251 under load, the joist compresses at the top edge, and filled bores will resist compression better. I don't think it's much practically, though, with small bores spaced far apart. Let us know how it goes!
    – P2000
    Commented May 13, 2021 at 1:29
  • I know that people have been testing the strength of boards with bores through the 1.5" dimension for a long time, and there are rules of thumb for bores in that dimension. Do you know of any existing studies of the bores through the 5.5" dimension, such as I am describing, that have already taken place? Commented May 14, 2021 at 15:51
  • @user1260251 no sorry I don't, which is why I proposed this physical test. I wouldn't be surprised if you found no or a barely noticeable difference, in which case this sample-of-one test would serve its purpose. More than once has an engineer or carpenter looked at my work, asked whether it was always like that, whether it cracks, gave it shake or nudge and said that, well, then it's ok. I am not saying this is the gold standard or wish to take away from their expertise and the value of codes.
    – P2000
    Commented May 14, 2021 at 17:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.