4

enter image description hereenter image description hereI was recently trying to upgrade a 20A breaker supplying outlets in my kitchen and dining room to a CAFCI breaker. When I opened my breaker box I saw that the neutral on this circuit was shared with an adjacent breaker, which supplies our kitchen refrigerator. This setup does not seem particularly safe (noted when I disconnected the outlet breaker and the neutral was sparking when I tried to disconnect it from the busbar). From reading around, it seems that the outlet and fridge breakers should have a handle tie since this is a MWBC. Is this correct? If so, can I replace both breakers with a double pole CAFCI breaker? Is it okay to have a fridge and kitchen outlets powered from the same breaker? Thanks in advance!

5
  • 1
    MWBC is dead common in kitchens, since you need 2 20A circuits to suport the countertop outlets. Lack of handle ties is dead common in older work, unfortunately.
    – Ecnerwal
    Dec 29, 2020 at 16:01
  • 2
    Sorry guys - this was a typo. It's actually 12/3. I edited the title. Dec 29, 2020 at 16:02
  • Thanks for your replies. I've attached a pic of the panel; my fingers are on the two breakers in question. Dec 29, 2020 at 16:15
  • 1
    The handle tie requirement before 2008 only applied to circuits on the same yoke (a split receptacle) or connections also feeding line to line connections. Your local jurisdiction may not have immediately adopted the 2008 version. 15 States haven't even adopted the 2017 yet. Dec 29, 2020 at 16:57
  • As long as you're making electrical upgrades to your kitchen, it's a good idea (though not required) to have your refrigerator on a dedicated circuit which is not part of an MWBC or SABC. This reduces the chance of an accidental trip going uncorrected (say, by a teenager or guest) and causing your food to spoil. Looks like your panel is pretty full, though. :( Dec 29, 2020 at 17:11

3 Answers 3

6

TLDR: Square D makes a 2-pole CAFCI (# QO220CAFIC) that will do what you want. However, this panel needs a lot more attention, as it has more "bomb" circuits like this one, and it's full, and addressing that will intersect with this issue.


It's called a Multi-wire Branch Circuit. There's nothing wrong with them. You're just a) unfamiliar with them, and b) they were installed in a manner that is now a Code violation. Precisely because of what you observed.

Note that an MWBC is one circuit. It is not 2 circuits with a shared neutral. It is one circuit.

MWBCs must have handle-tied breakers

These are required so that people doing maintenance on the circuit shut off both halves of the circuit, so they don't get nailed by unexpected neutral current from the other half. (Or exactly what happened to you).

MWBCs MUST be on opposite phases - 240V between legs

This is mandatory or the neutral wire will be overloaded.

This is AC power, but it's constructive to think of it as DC. If neutral is 0V, then think of one leg as +120V. The other leg needs to be -120V. If one leg has 14A and the other leg has 15A, then 14A of current simply bypasses neutral, and neutral flow is only 1A.

However if both legs were +120V, and you had 14A and 15A currents, neutral would bear 29A which is way over its safety rating. Neutrals don't have breakers, so the only defense is wiring the MWBC correctly.

Of course it's AC, so it switches to the exact opposite 120 times a second, but the general principle bears. Opposite legs makes neutral safe.

Now look at those "double-stuff" breakers in your panel's upper right. Those fit in 1 space, which attaches to 1 pole (leg). That means you have the same leg on both half-breakers. That sounds like a TERRIBLE thing to put an MWBC on, doesn't it? Yet, thisis a very common blunder.

How about a 2-pole breaker instead of "handle-ties"?

After all, they're a lot easier to find. (they look like a "double wide" breaker, which on your QO type has a single handle; everyone else's has double handles.) You betcha. They're a great choice for those reasons.

However, they are more than just handle-tied. Inside the breaker is a "common trip" mechanism which provides a guarantee that if one side trips, so does the other. Handle ties don't guarantee it.

Here's an interesting fact about MWBCs: They can power both 120V and 240V loads at the same time! However, if they do, they must have a common trip breaker i.e. 240V breaker. So you could fit, say a NEMA 6-15 recep for some European appliance. They even make combo 5-15/6-15 receps for both in one receptacle.

So now that you've bitten the fruit from the tree of knowledge...

You need to go through this entire panel and identify every MWBC. Look for cables coming in that have both black and red wires. Identify and follow its pigtailed wires. Make sure every MWBC

  • Opposite-phased (240V between the hot legs) at the very least
  • On a handle-tied or 2-pole breaker. (2-pole breakers are $18 because you have the expensive but excellent Square D "QO" type; handle-ties will be cheaper).
  • MWBCs and tandem breakers (like in upper right) are very tricky and dangerous. You may have to confront this issue.

If you need to double-stuff some of your MWBCs for lack of panel space, then call around to real electrical supply houses and find out who is a Square D dealer. Talk to them about your options. There is a type of breaker that is both double-stuff and 2-pole called a "Quadplex", those work with MWBCs, but they are hard to get. They can also advise you on the possibility of handle-tying the inner switches on 2 adjacent tandems.

Your panel is very full - time to start thinking subpanel

This panel is absolutely full. You have no breathing space, even correcting MWBC handle-ties could be a challenge. It might seem like you've only just begun double-stuffing this panel, but they're only allowed in the top 5 rows. 8 of those 10 spaces are already double-stuffed (that thing in row 5 left is an "old school" tandem designed to be installed 2 abreast with handle-ties on one or both; pity you only have the one.)

So you are maxed out.

The problem is you have too few spaces for as much main breaker as you have. This is very common; houses these days really need 50-ish spaces. The builder thought "Oh, this is a 30-space/40-circuit panel, it'll be FINE!" but you know that is not so.

Swapping the whole panel for a 60-space would be mad; that's very expensive and very disruptive. If there is space to the left, you can simply install a subpanel there. Note how things to the right are connected with short nipples of PVC conduit. Do the same thing but with steel conduit, so it carries ground to the sub. And have 1 big pipe (for the feeder wires) and 2 more little ones (they are so very useful, it's sad when people omit them).

Fortunately your panels are all surface mounted, so they're easier to work with.

If you want to put the subpanel somewhere else in the house so you can shorten some cable runs, that's fine too.

As far as brand, QO is of course excellent. If you're thinking future generator, several panels will do. However, here's an interesting tidbit: GE has an AFCI breaker that does not require a neutral wire. It's specifically marketed to work on MWBCs.

Oh yeah... that AFCI

On MWBCs, AFCI is harder because it depends on the existence of 2-pole AFCI breakers from the manufacturer. (QO physically can't take competitor breakers*, but other 1" panels shouldn't because even though they seem to fit, they aren't physically compatible at the bus stab.)

They make a 2-pole GFCI for your panel, QO220CAFIC, but it's a bit hard to find.

Fortunately it's not mandatory since this is old work. (For new work, don't use MWBC unless...)

There's also that GE breaker. Can't put it in anything but a GE panel, but you're due for a subpanel, so that's a thought.

Other than that, your AFCI option is to fit an AFCI receptacle at the first recep location in the chain. That will not provide protection for the cable run from panel to first recep!



* Difference in the shape of the bus stabs makes it bad to put brand X breaker in brand Y panel. However, UL has a certification program for companies making breakers specifically for competitor panels. The only ones I'm aware of are Eaton "CHQ" and Siemens "QD" for QO panels, and Eaton CL for certain 1" wide breaker panels.

6
  • They could get a two-pole QO CAFCI and use that instead of a regular two-pole breaker... Dec 29, 2020 at 22:36
  • 1
    You mention GE and other options. But sticking with the same brand/type of panel would have the advantage of being able to move circuits selectively as needed, without having to have two different types of breakers, etc. Dec 29, 2020 at 22:42
  • 1
    @ThreePhaseEel Oh, they do have those! Shoulda checked lol. That'll work for this one, but I see a lot of red in this panel, so I bet there are a lot more MWBCs on those tandems. Dec 29, 2020 at 23:12
  • 1
    @manassehkatz The reason I mention other brands is they do a better job of supporting some things, e.g. GE's unique AFCI breaker or Siemens' generator interlocks. Also QO is stupid overpriced. Dec 29, 2020 at 23:29
  • Thanks so much for the detailed reply - this really helps! I added another pic, and as you'll see, we do have a sub-panel (added when our home inspector flagged the main panel for having shared neutrals). A few more questions: Dec 31, 2020 at 14:31
1

Yes you can use a two-pole CAFCI for a MWBC.

The handle tie requirement for most MWBC's was first required in the 2008 version of the NEC. The handle tie requirement was adopted to prevent events like the sparking you experienced.

Yes it is OK to have the fridge and other kitchen outlets on the same circuits breaker. It isn't even a requirement to have the fridge on a dedicated circuit unless specified by the instructions that come with the fridge.

0

Years ago handle ties were not required however I tell customers that want me to upgrade once done I cannot remove them and although it is legal and common to have the fridge on the small appliance circuit NEC 210.52.4.B.1 I do not recommend the upgrade if the fridg is on this circuit. I recommend changing the fridge to a non GFCI /Arc fault device because Refridgeration equipment is known to cause false trips, and shortened life of the device.

In Your case square D makes a Handel tie a plastic or metal spool that fits between the handles.

Would I update to CAFCI ? Not on a multi wire branch circuit, and especially not on a circuit supplying a refrigerator. Both have issues and my state still allows the frig to be a standard breaker ( not a GFCI breaker it can be done with receptacles without nuisance trips without using load terminals).

Note I have all but quit using MWBC’s because just about every circuit requires GFCI or AFCI protection and the common neutral is the problem with false trips unless a double pole is used and they are expensive and haven’t lasted long with motor loads in my experience.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.