# Will my wooden bridge withstand the weight of my small truck?

I am building a bridge across a small stream. I have 3 hemlock planks that are 24 feet long, and are 6 inches by 4 inches in dimension. The hemlock planks are positioned so that the 6 inch sides are vertical, and the 4 inch sides are horizontal.

The 3 hemlock beams are resting on the sides of the river bank. There are no supports in the middle for the planks. The beams overlap the banks of the stream by about 4 feet on either side, so there is 16 feet of unsupported beam crossing the stream.

I am putting 2x6 planking on top of the hemlock beams to complete the top-side of the bridge.

I want to calculate if I can drive my 1.5 ton ATV across the bridge. Will the hemlock beams support its weight, or will they crack when my ATV gets into the middle of the bridge?

• You say there are 3 beams, but you also say there’s “no support in the middle for the planks”. Does that mean 2 beams are on one side of the bridge and one beam on the other side? How wide is the bridge? Nov 16, 2020 at 2:58
• Is there a grade stamp on each beam? Nov 16, 2020 at 7:03
• The elephant in the room nobody's noticed: What are the ends sitting on? If they're just resting on the dirt, then A) they'll sink in over time and every time they're driven over will speed the sinking, and B) they'll start rotting out from being in contact with wet soil. Nov 16, 2020 at 16:23
• @FreeMan, that only matters if the bridge survives long enough for you to drive over it a second time.
– Mark
Nov 17, 2020 at 3:20

From conventional Hemlock Span tables it seems your 4x6s are only good for about 10' span at 40LBS live load. Your load is much higher when the trucks out in the middle of the bridge.

I think this is what you've got:

Can you get 2x12s? or better, get an engineer to run the numbers. You will need to calculate the actual load and deflection and not just rely on flooring span tables since your load is very specific and not distributed over the entire span.

• 3000lbs at 40psf is only 12x6¼ft of floor space. That doesn't seem entirely unreasonable (I'm not saying that the proposed bridge is safe, just that this answer could do with some more details) Nov 17, 2020 at 15:32

For a good answer you'd have to do the engineering calculations but maybe just do a sanity check before digging into that.

You could think about this. A single 4x6 standing on edge is not that much different from two 2x6's. Your three 4x6's are not that much different from six 2x6's. Let's say your bridge is six feet wide.

Under a floor in your house, 6' wide with six 2x6 joists spaced 12" on center, you could span 11' - 12-1/2' depending on the type and grade of wood. That's not designed around where the floor would collapse, rather where the floor will be stiff and not "bouncy."

But that's a floor people walk on and put furniture on, not a bridge people drive a truck across. At 16', I am going to say there's no way that's adequate.

Note this answer is only based on basic engineering knowledge and not on experience in building bridges or using wood as structural elements. There are probably more things to consider using wood as it is a natural material and the properties can vary extremely (wrong grain direction = no strength).

A rough back of the envelope bending stress calculation for the beams (not the planks) when they are fixed on one side:

Bending moment: 1.5 t * 10 m/s^2 * (16 ft/4) = 18 kNm

Section modulus: ( (6 in)^2 * 3 * 4 in)/6 = 72 in^3

Maximum bending stress: 18 kNm / 72 in^3 = 15 MPa = 15000 kPa

According to this document the rupture strength of dry hemlock is around 60000 kPa. So based on that it would be fine, even green hemlock is listed with 43000 kPa.

The deflection would be around 2 inches, which sounds a bit much.

Now even if it would be a steel bridge with the above results, you'd want to apply a big safety margin as your life depends on it, so at least a factor of 5 or something like that. Which means you can only use a fifth of the strength which would reduce the usable strength down to 8600 kPa to 12000 kPa.

Which is below the calculated 15000 kPa bending stress. So you'd need more beams or bigger beams to support that load.

Please note again, I'm not an expert in that area and you should consult one if you value your life or your ATV.

• In your section modulus calc, what the *3 for? (3 separate beams?) If the point load is centered on the bridge, can you really divide all the stress between the three beams or will the center ones stress be double each of the other two? Nov 17, 2020 at 20:26
• Working load at 25% of the expected failure point?!?! Unsafe! Nov 18, 2020 at 5:29
• @markf yes the *3 is for the three separate beams increasing the effective cross section. The stress will divide almost evenly if your wheels are between the beams. The deflection of the beams will equalize. Nov 18, 2020 at 6:57
• @LorenPechtel those factors are not unrealistic. Nov 18, 2020 at 6:58
• Recommend at least 10X margin on rupture. And nobody has considered the weight of the wood which is considerable. What about dynamic loading? Will it always be you carefully driving? Nov 18, 2020 at 14:02

This simple trick greatly increases strength your construction can take: Put smaller planks on top such that they rest close to edges. Longer you have second set - better.

• I have no idea what I'm looking at. Nov 18, 2020 at 4:08
• @Nelson I think it's supposed to be a vehicle climbing onto a bridge made with 2 sets of horizontal beams without any connections between them except at the ends. Nov 18, 2020 at 6:24
• This is an interesting idea, if you can expand on it, I'm sure you could turn around those downvotes. Nov 19, 2020 at 15:59
• Looks to me like the suggestion is to put these additional shorter beams on top of the OP's bridge, concentrating the force to the edges of the main bridge beams
– izzy
Dec 16, 2020 at 13:48
• Please feel free to edit more information into your answer. As it stands, many of us are confused by what you're saying. Dec 28, 2020 at 14:10