I have read that you can support a granite overhang (such as a bar) using 1/4" steel bars below or embedded in the rough top.

The purpose of this is to support the 16" overhang without using corbels or posts which get in the way of barstools.

However, given the 3/4" MDF rough top, I find that the 1/4" steel bars are more flexible than the MDF.

My intention was to use a power planer to cut channels into the rough top, then to epoxy the steel as bracing into the MDF, as shown in this example photo (not of my actual install):

Steel bars in subtop

But will this actually give me any more support? Am I just gaining tensile strength for the MDF?

  • 3
    The 1/4" steel by itself may be more flexible in bending than the whole 3/4" MDF top, but that's not really the comparison that matters. What matters is whether the steel is stronger/stiffer than the small section of MDF you're removing (i.e. the 1/4" deep channel you'd rout out). I'll leave it to others as to whether this is actually suitable for the application. My engineering gut reaction is that once you laminate the granite top to the rough top with adhesive, that this steel won't do much...its right at the center of the lamination, where there's very little bending stress anyway.
    – mac
    Commented Nov 19, 2012 at 23:00
  • 1
    For straps that wide, it would require 3/8" or 1/2" steel. As you've found, 1/4 hot rolled steel just isn't that stiff. Commented Nov 20, 2012 at 15:25
  • How did this work out? I'm considering doing something similar to custom island.
    – user34352
    Commented Mar 5, 2015 at 20:21
  • @lenny Check my answer below about using square stock. I found that it worked fine. I wouldn't recommend standing on it but it seemed rigid enough. I suspect a welded lattice would have been better but my way has held up. Just be sure than when you place the slab on the subtop that you have fully covered it (using notched trowel) with your adhesive. Don't just use a few globs (as I have seen installers do)
    – Matthew
    Commented Mar 8, 2015 at 3:59

4 Answers 4


Based on the flexibility of the flat bar stock, I decided to use square 1/2" tube stock.

Using a 3/4" MDF subtop, I routed channels 5/8" wide and 9/16" deep. I then filled these channels with polyurethane glue, set in the steel bars, and finally I used a drywall knife to spread and flatten glue over the top of the bars.

Here are pictures of my actual work:
The cabinets are backed by a 2x8 pony wall. The MDF is glued and screwed to the pony wall and all cabinet frames. The steel bars span everywhere except the sink cabinet.

Sink side routing Corner side routing Glue applied


How much of an overhand do you plan on having? The spec I saw was that 10 inches were allowed with no supports. When the granite guy came to measure mine he told me I didn't really need them even at 12. I had alread put in corbels which look good, but do get in the way of knees. If I did it again, I would consider going to 10" and not having any bracking.

If the steel is epoxied to the granite, it will help, but I don't see the strips as shown doing that much good.

I have seen examples of granite on knee walls where a 1/4 inch plate spanned almost the entire granite slab.

  • Overhang is 16"
    – Matthew
    Commented Nov 20, 2012 at 0:16
  • If the strip steel is epoxied to the bottom surface of the granite, it'll do almost nothing. The bottom of the granite is exposed to compressive stress due to the bending, and granite is very good at resisting compressive stress all by itself. To help with the bending, you either need to make a sub-top that takes all the bending load by itself; or you'd need to laminate something with good tensile strength to the TOP of the granite top (where the tensile load is), which I don't think too many customers would be happy about.
    – mac
    Commented Nov 20, 2012 at 16:32
  • @mac the goal is to add rigidity to the subtop. As implemented, the steel resists flex in the MDF (tensile at the top, compressive at the bottom)
    – Matthew
    Commented Nov 20, 2012 at 17:01
  • but once you've laminated the granite to the subtop, the top of the subtop isn't the top of the composite member anymore---it's the middle.
    – mac
    Commented Nov 20, 2012 at 17:08
  • @mac I understand, but a rigid subtop helps prevent stress on the stone. Otherwise, why use a subtop?
    – Matthew
    Commented Nov 20, 2012 at 19:27

I don't know much about countertop weights, I've never done one, but I can tell you that flat steel is strongest along it's smallest edge. It's not supposed to be too rigid when flat. For example, if I have a quarter inch thick piece of steel, 3 inches wide and 1 foot long, if I put it down flat on 2 end supports and stood on it, it would bow. If I braced the sides and put my body weight on the quarter inch thick part, it wouldn't bow, there's 3 inches of steel supporting me instead of quarter inch.

I would recommend angle steel for you here. Route it, not plane. Angled steel is strong along both sides. You can get angle iron at most home improvement stores, just route out a deep channel for the other leg of the steel. Another thing that's pretty strong is hollow round stock, that may be easier for you to work with, and the arches help a lot.

  • 1
    Naturally, the strength will be along the smallest edge (as an i-beam) but I am limited in thickness to that of my subtop. Perhaps I'll route in square-tube stock rather than flat bar stock.
    – Matthew
    Commented Nov 19, 2012 at 23:20

The photo in the question shows a superior approach to adding steel for granite support. Yes the 1/4" square bar will add rigidity but a 1/2" x 2" flat bar would roughly be the equivalent of 16 1/4" square bars. 1/2" x 3" would be like 24 1/4" x 1/4" bars. Hollow tubing and angle is only an application to get the most strength from the least weight. A solid bar with the same overall dimensions will be much more rigid. Do you really think that filling in tubular steel with solid steel will somehow magically weaken the tubular stock. Lastly, adding the rigidity to the sub-section is perfectly fine. For the granite to move it has to move the sub-structure. Yes it's true that technically, having the plate on top of the granite would be stronger since with the granite not being easily compressed, the steel at the top would actually have to stretch which would take more force than for it to flex. However that conversation in this application is just a distraction and a waste of our time. Craig Director Mechanical Engineering Gables Engineering

  • The challenge I faced with using the bar stock rather than the square tubing was in preparing the channels. It was very easy to make channels for tube stock using a single pass with a router. Bar stock required multiple passes.
    – Matthew
    Commented Sep 27, 2016 at 20:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.