1

I have a bad swing check valve and was thinking of replacing with a 3/4 Double Check Valve Backflow Preventer Assembly. The utility pressure is 10 PSI and is hard water. Since my current check valve has failed in such a short time (2 years) and will cost me quite a bit to break the concrete driveway where it is currently located, I thought this would be better since it can be serviced without removing and O-rings are easily available.

Would pressure be diminished with a double check valve?

Would it work at all at such a low pressure?

Edit:

In the tech specs, the only thing I could find regarding pressure is the following:

The FEBCO Double Check Assembly Backflow Preventer consists of two independently operating, spring
loaded check valves. The pressure drop across the first check valve is approximately 1.0 PSIG with no flow.
The pressure drop across the second check valve is also 1.0 PSIG with no flow. A complete assembly
includes two shut-off valves and four test cocks.
2
  • Are you putting a pit or vault in for future access to the backflow preventer? – ThreePhaseEel Nov 1 '20 at 4:11
  • 1
    A pit in the form of an irrigation box. – Rick Nov 1 '20 at 11:37
1

Since you are providing access to the backflow preventer...

Since you are providing an irrigation box for the backflow preventer, which means that you can access the preventer down the road, your plan is sound as far as that goes. Note that Double Check Valve assemblies are considered testable, which means that in many jurisdictions, you will need to test them on a regular basis (such as yearly, or every other year, as discussed in this City of Tallahassee document) as well as at the time of installation. This test is usually performed by a plumber, but your water utility may provide this service to residential customers for a small additional fee on your water bill. This all is atop having to register your preventer with the water utility, which consists mostly of filling out and sending them the appropriate form. Of course, if you're on a well, then you don't have utility regs to worry about, but you should still test the preventer on a regular basis to ensure that your well doesn't get contaminated by backflow.

...but as to that head loss

According to the FEBCO LF850 specsheet, a 3/4" LF850 will have about 5-6psi of head loss across it for flow rates below 20gpm. Considering that most folks won't push more than 12gpm through a 3/4" line anyway, you might be able to get away with it, depending on how much head loss is in the rest of the system and what this is protecting. If that 5psi of loss is excessive, then you'll need a booster pump after the preventer. Note that that may impose more stringent testing requirements on your backflow preventer.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.