No, no, no! You would be upsizing the breaker.
The breaker that has failed is a 15A breaker. The wire going to it is on a 15A breaker for a reason.
The breaker you propose to move to is a 20A. That will compromise its protection because it'll allow 20A on a hot wire only made for 15A. Don't do that.
But there's an even bigger risk
On a shared-neutral circuit (its proper name is Multi-Wire Branch Circuit or MWBC), the two "hots" must be on opposite poles. There must be 240V between them. If there is, then neutral will handle only differential current. However, if they are on the same pole, there will be 0V between them, and that means neutral handles the sum of currents. I.e. On a 20A MWBC, neutral would be handling 40A.
Now on these Zinsco style breakers, they clip onto two parallel rails. These are funny ducks. These are "double-stuff" breakers, two independent breakers crammed into one space, and again, the lack of handle-tie gives this away. ThreePhaseEel says they are locked into 2-pole (opposite pole) mode, which does make them suitable for MWBCs.
Regardless, Code now requires MWBCs be on breakers which are either 2-pole with tied handles (or handle-tied with a listed factory handle tie, but on this panel, that'll be a unicorn). The reason MWBCs require tied handles is they must have common maintenance shutoff so you don't measure out a circuit, find the breaker that turns it off, disconnect the neutral and get nailed by the other half of the circuit. A side-effect of this handle-tie requirement is it forces the sub-circuits onto opposite poles.
Don't overthink it, though
The easiest way to solve a "dead breaker, full panel" problem is to take the now-dead circuit and add it to another circuit. So now one breaker is powering 2 former circuits. Choose the breaker so they are the same size, obviously.
You do the splice with a wire-nut and a pigtail. Join the 2 hots and a pigtail in a wire nut, land the pigtail on the breaker.
You must still be careful with MWBCs, and don't accidentally wire the two MWBC sides on the same pole. However, if you excuse the Ghostbusters references, we can "cross the streams" by putting both MWBC hots together on the same single breaker. Normally "that would be bad" (both hots are on the same pole), but since they're coming off the same (say 15A) single breaker, the summed current can't exceed 15A and the neutral can handle that. So we're OK.
Oh, but that panel
Aside from this being dangerous...
... also, that is a "Rule of Six" or split-bus panel. This means your house has no main Main breaker. "Rule of Six" means "up to six" breakers in the Upper Section (the top 7 spaces) are, collectively, your main breaker, and you must turn off all 6 to deenergize your house. In your case, 5. Those top 3 breakers are 2-pole, note the factory handle-ties. For "Rule of Six" purposes, a handle-tied breaker counts as one throw action.
Below that is another section of the panel called the "lighting section" where all the ordinary loads are expected to be. This section is effectively a subpanel, and it is fed from the bottom 60A breaker in the "Main Breakers" section. You can see the fat feed wires. Anyway, one easy option here is to fit a real subpanel adjacent to this panel, with modern breakers, and move all the "subpanel" circuits over to that real subpanel. Then you can have real 2-pole breakers on your MWBCs or ones with handle-ties.
