1

This is meant to be a general question - I'm not asking about any specific breaker. More of a practical methodology question.

Some breakers are clearly labelled as to whether or not they accept a double tap (two wires under one screw / clamp).

But if there are no markings or they are illegible, which seems to be common with older breakers I have seen, is it likely to be acceptable to assume a double tap is or is not okay based on the shape of the terminal clamp?

In this example there are clearly two 'slots' where the wires are meant to go:

enter image description here

Would seeing such a clamp (or similar) guarantee that this is OK to do?

| improve this question | | | | |
  • Can you provide a photo of the breaker overall? – ThreePhaseEel Aug 23 '18 at 23:00
  • What do the labeling and instructions say? What make of panel/breaker is it? – Harper - Reinstate Monica Aug 24 '18 at 0:28
  • @Harper thanks for your comment, made me realize I wasn't phrasing my question well enough. I've edited to try & clarify. – UuDdLrLrSs Aug 24 '18 at 11:24
  • @ThreePhaseEel hopefully my question edits made it more clear why I used such a cropped portion; but I'll try & find the full photo & add it for better context. – UuDdLrLrSs Aug 24 '18 at 11:25
  • 1
    Yes, a larger photo would let us recognize the breaker type and go "oh yeah, Pushmatics do allow that". – Harper - Reinstate Monica Aug 24 '18 at 12:50
2

In my opinion the particular breaker terminal you are showing, is legal for connection of two conductors. The only residential breaker that I know of that has this feature is a Square D Type QO. Maybe a Cutler Hammer Type CH, I think?

Regardless, it doesn't matter what my opinion is unless it is the AHJ agrees. I have had this discussion with local Inspectors many times and I can say that I have won about 50% of the time and lost 50% of the time.

In conclusion, check with your local authorities because what he allows and doesn't allow is really all that matters.

| improve this answer | | | | |
  • So I presume that some AHJ's might want to see an explicit label before they allow this, and others are more comfortable being pragmatic based on the visible characteristics of the terminal? – UuDdLrLrSs Aug 24 '18 at 16:27
  • What does AHJ stand for? – donjuedo Aug 24 '18 at 17:11
  • 1
    @donjuedo - Authority Having Jurisdiction – Retired Master Electrician Aug 24 '18 at 17:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.