I have a Jenn Air C221 modular cooktop (circa 1983). EDIT: here is the wiring diagram: C221 wiring diagram

By design, the downdraft fan turns on whenever a grill element is installed and turned on. This is done using an extra spade contact present on the grill element (but not the burner cartridge) which is shunted to one of the other contacts used for powering the element. So if the fan switch is off, the fan will be powered from terminal H1 of the grill element switch via the shunted receptacle contacts.

Now imagine the following scenario, starting with all elements switched off:

  1. The fan is switched on, i.e. the fan is being powered from L1 through its switch
  2. The switch for one or both grill elements is then turned on
  3. There exists a fault in the connection between L1 and H1 at the switch (e.g. no continuity inside the switch between L1 and H1, or either of L1 or H1 terminals on the switch are disconnected), but there is no fault with the connection from L2 to H2.

Would this effectively cause the grill element to be powered through the fan switch?

EDIT: here is an annotated wiring diagram for when a grill is installed in the right bay, and the front element is turned on. The red path is where I suspect current would flow, and the red 'X' indicates that no current can flow through its normal path out the black wire from the receptacle due to a fault.

C221 wiring diagram with current flow illustrated

According to the housing for a replacement switch, it is only rated 6A 3A at 250V, whereas the element could draw over 10A; is this an imminent safety issue/fire hazard, or are the faults leading to this issue considered extremely unlikely?

I'm not sure how pervasive this feature or wiring configuration is. After briefly looking online for other models' wiring diagrams, some (such as the CVEX4100B) use the same configuration as the C221, while others (such as the SVE47600) use a relay to implement this feature.

  • 1
    Look at it this way. First and foremost the model is UL tested. Qualified engineers evaluated this schematic and then tested the physical circuit and concluded it was safe. Second, these Jenn-Airs were quite popular in their day (at least all the old houses in my neighborhood seem to have one) and they have been in circulation for up to 25 yrs. I only just replaced ours last year. If there were a safety hazard in this design it is unlikely to have gone undetected for so long.
    – Stanwood
    Commented May 9, 2018 at 18:39

1 Answer 1


Original answer: no

Edit: Maybe

With the revised diagram and the path highlighted, the possible L1-heating element-L2 path via the fan switch is now discernible. Theoretically, yes, you could have a heating element "shorted" through the fan switch.


Cooktop switches (especially ca. 1983) aren't on-off switches, they are simmerstats - like slow, analog PWM controllers for resistive heating elements. They function by drawing a small bit of current through a heating element inside the switch, which causes a bimetal strip to deflect and "pulses" the L2 contact. A cursory Google search suggests the deflecting L2 contact is more likely to fail (open or closed) than for the relatively static L1 contact (held in place by the knob itself).


Your concern is at least somewhat validated because there is the potential for a short there (barring any fuses or fail-safe devices that aren't shown in the diagram). However, since the L2 contact is left alone in your scenario, you should still be able to turn the burner off and control it normally, even if the L1 contact fails open. It also seems as though the more common problem is a failed switch in general, resulting in a burner that either can't be turned on (relatively safe) or can't be turned off (decidedly unsafe).


Your primary concern is the voltage rating on the switch, which is rated at 6A @ 125VAC or 3A @ 250VAC (or 1/4HP @ 125-250VAC), but in the scenario you describe could see as much as 10A @ 250VAC. Given that the switch is rated for motor loads, it is designed to handle high-inrush current levels at the moment the switch is closed. So how well it fares in your scenario may depend on whether or not the fan was already running. Given the unlikely nature of the scenario, it's plausible the engineers designing your stove weren't concerned about the possibility of powering a stove element through the switch in the event of an abnormal switch failure mode.

  • I'm inclined to revise my question by highlighting the wiring diagram with the path I suspect current would flow. The failure that I'm describing is such that the element sees L2 at one end through the switch, and L1 at the other end but only through the (closed) fan switch rather than the element switch (due to a fault). So the element would still try running off 240V but in an unsafe manner. The neutral is irrelevant here since the only things connected to it are the fan and the pilot lights. Commented May 9, 2018 at 11:21
  • @chrstphrchvz I have updated my answer to reflect the edits in your question (and to be more thorough). Hopefully you find the information helpful.
    – Chris M.
    Commented May 9, 2018 at 14:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.