25

This doesn't look like it should fly to me, but the "electrician" hired by the seller of this property is arguing that this is an acceptable way to put an open splice into an box. I know this shouldn't be allowed, but is there phrasing in the code to support this being unacceptable? Their contractor is saying it just needs to be in a box, and if he staples it down within 8" it is fine. He "repaired about 20 open splices this way. You can see how he just modified the boxes and placed the open splices into them as they were before and just left them all over the attic like this. What kind of tradesman takes this little pride in their work?

junction Box Phot4Junction Box photo3Junction Box Photo1junction Box Photo4

  • 9
    My guess is that modification negates UL listing, which would therefore violate code. Waiting for one of our resident sparkies to come along.... – isherwood Nov 29 '17 at 21:56
  • 18
    "Hello, electrician licensing board? I have an allegedly licensed electrician who has committed at least forty dangerous violations in my house and claims it's okay because nobody is going to inspect it. Is that how it's supposed to work?" – Upnorth Nov 30 '17 at 0:13
  • 9
    110.12 Mechanical Execution of Work. Electrical equipment shall be installed in a neat and workmanlike manner. – Tester101 Nov 30 '17 at 2:08
  • 8
    I gather that the previous owner had made a lot of open splices and this guy then came along and "fixed" them by fitting boxes around them. I doubt that this would pass inspection in most parts of the country (unless the inspector's palm was "lubricated"), but it's probably a hair better than before. The real problem is that, if the previous owner created such blatant violations, what else did he do wrong, and how trustworthy are those splices? – Hot Licks Nov 30 '17 at 3:00
  • 6
    (Do note that it would have been a lot of tedious work to fix things properly, which is why the sparky was reluctant to tackle the job "correctly".) – Hot Licks Nov 30 '17 at 3:01
42

Red tag party, anyone?

Hoo boy, that installer needs to get knocked back to school with a Codebook! What's in the photos alone violates several sections of the NEC, starting with 314.17(A) on the excessive openings for conductors:

(A) Openings to Be Closed. Openings through which conductors enter shall be closed in an approved manner.

We then move on to 314.23, where the utter lack of box support strikes:

314.23 Supports. Enclosures within the scope of this article shall be supported in accordance with one or more of the provisions in 314.23(A) through (H).

Note that nowhere in the subsections does it allow for a box to flop loose on some insulation, supported only by cabling that is not strain-relieved to the box by an approved means (such as a cord grip).

Also note the bulging box lids, which are indicative of a violation of the general provisions of 314.16:

314.16 Number of Conductors in Outlet, Device, and Junction Boxes, and Conduit Bodies. Boxes and conduit bodies shall be of an approved size to provide free space for all enclosed conductors. In no case shall the volume of the box, as calculated in 314.16(A), be less than the fill calculation as calculated in 314.16(B). The minimum volume for conduit bodies shall be as calculated in 314.16(C).

The provisions of this section shall not apply to terminal housings supplied with motors or generators.

Informational Note: For volume requirements of motor or generator terminal housings, see 430.12.

Boxes and conduit bodies enclosing conductors 4 AWG or larger shall also comply with the provisions of 314.28.

From there, we continue the party at 300.11(A) on support:

300.11 Securing and Supporting.

(A) Secured in Place. Raceways, cable assemblies, boxes, cabinets, and fittings shall be securely fastened in place. Support wires that do not provide secure support shall not be permitted as the sole support. Support wires and associated fittings that provide secure support and that are installed in addition to the ceiling grid support wires shall be permitted as the sole support. Where independent support wires are used, they shall be secured at both ends. Cables and raceways shall not be supported by ceiling grids.

and move on to 300.3(A) and (B) for the single wires run loose in the attic:

300.3 Conductors.

(A) Single Conductors. Single conductors specified in Table 310.104(A) shall only be installed where part of a recognized wiring method of Chapter 3.

Exception: Individual conductors shall be permitted where installed as separate overhead conductors in accordance with 225.6.

(B) Conductors of the Same Circuit. All conductors of the same circuit and, where used, the grounded conductor and all equipment grounding conductors and bonding conductors shall be contained within the same raceway, auxiliary gutter, cable tray, cablebus assembly, trench, cable, or cord, unless otherwise permitted in accordance with 300.3(B)(1) through (B)(4).

Finishing things off, we can write the installer up for violating 110.12, including 110.12(A) specifically:

110.12 Mechanical Execution of Work. Electrical equipment shall be installed in a neat and workmanlike manner.

Informational Note: Accepted industry practices are described in ANSI/NECA 1-2010, Standard Practice of Good Workmanship in Electrical Construction. and other ANSI- approved installation standards.

(A) Unused Openings. Unused openings, other than those intended for the operation of equipment, those intended for mounting purposes, or those permitted as part of the design for listed equipment, shall be closed to afford protection substantially equivalent to the wall of the equipment. Where metallic plugs or plates are used with nonmetallic enclosures, they shall be recessed at least 6 mm (1/4 in.) from the outer surface of the enclosure.

  • 3
    Thank you! Between these two answers I should have enough to shame this turkey into refunding this woman's money. – Shane Nov 30 '17 at 0:41
  • 1
    I agree the square cut out is not legal also you may have covered this in "a" . this guy has a license? Really, wow...+ – Ed Beal Nov 30 '17 at 0:42
  • 4
    He has a residential builders license and carpenter certification that I could find. Dude shouldn't be doing electrical work if you ask me. We have almost no code enforcement where I live. – Shane Nov 30 '17 at 3:12
  • 2
    A "code violation" is not necessarily the same as an administrative, let alone criminal violation of licensing laws. In theory, even if "done to code", work without the required license may be illegal. I have seen license boards pass the buck (to the District Attorney) when they have no jurisdiction over non-licensed workers. – Upnorth Nov 30 '17 at 12:58
  • 2
    ...also not counting what appears to be unsheathed lone conductors going into that first box. That's definitely a violation - sheathing needs to go all the way into the box. – J... Nov 30 '17 at 22:40
17

In my jurisdiction, the owner (and his contractor) is responsible for making sure there are no violations of fire code and building code, including electrical code, whether or not anyone inspects prior to a catastrophe.

NFPA 70 (2014):

110.3 (B) Installation and Use. Listed or labeled equipment shall be installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling.

110.12 Mechanical Execution of Work. Electrical equipment shall be installed in a neat and workmanlike manner.... (B) ...There shall be no damaged parts that may adversely affect safe operation or mechanical strength of the equipment such as parts that are broken; bent; cut; or deteriorated by corrosion, chemical action, or overheating.

314.17:

Conductors Entering Boxes, Conduit Bodies, or Fittings. Conductors entering boxes, conduit bodies, or fittings shall be protected from abrasion and shall comply with 314.17(A) through (D).

(A) Openings to Be Closed. Openings through which conductors enter shall be closed in an approved manner.

(C) Nonmetallic Boxes and Conduit Bodies....Where nonmetallic sheathed cable or multiconductor Type UF cable is used, the sheath shall extend not less than 6 mm (1⁄4 in.) inside the box and beyond any cable clamp. In all instances, all permitted wiring methods shall be secured to the boxes.

However,

Exception: Where nonmetallic-sheathed cable or multiconductor Type UF cable is used with single gang boxes not larger than a nominal size 57 mm × 100 mm (21⁄4 in. × 4 in.) mounted in walls or ceilings, and where the cable is fastened within 200 mm (8 in.) of the box measured along the sheath and where the sheath extends through a cable knockout not less than 6 mm (1⁄4 in.), securing the cable to the box shall not be required. Multiple cable entries shall be permitted in a single cable knockout opening.

I doubt that cutting or drilling your own holes in a listed and labeled box (as shown in your situation) counts as "a cable knockout", thus the exception would not apply. Also, some of the photos show boxes more than "single gang", nor are ANY of them "mounted in walls or ceilings", if they're shown in unfinished attic spaces.

  • Thank you! This is the sort of detail I needed to fight for this to be properly corrected! – Shane Nov 30 '17 at 0:40
  • 1
    You can punch holes in some listed boxes but clamps / bushings are required. – Ed Beal Nov 30 '17 at 0:44
  • Yes, there are certainly "some listed boxes" that can be punched for your purpose, but the "exception" shown clearly says "cable knockout". Would you say a field-modified punch-out/cut-out would qualify as "permitted" here? – Upnorth Nov 30 '17 at 12:44
  • 1
    @upnorth go to an electrical supply house and browse the tools up front, they make several kinds of drills and punches specifically for that purpose for standard knockout sizes. Fit a cable clamp and yer done. However you wouldn't do that on those cheap plastic boxes, by cheap I mean construction not price. I have seen field applied knockouts overlap factory knockouts, no big deal, the bolted cable clamp/nipple holds them together. – Harper Nov 30 '17 at 15:51
  • @Upnorth -- half the problem with the field cutouts the OP found is they don't strain-relieve the cable to the box. – ThreePhaseEel Dec 1 '17 at 2:23
8

Most likely these are taut splices, twisted/added onto cables by cutting themmid-run. That means there is not the free wire length needed in the box.

300.14 Length of Free Conductors at Outlets, Junctions, and Switch Points. At least 150 mm (6 in.) of free conductor, measured from the point in the box where it emerges from its raceway or cable sheath, shall be left at each outlet, junction, and switch point for splices or the connection of luminaires or devices. Where the opening to an outlet, junction, or switch point is less than 200 mm (8 in.) in any dimension, each conductor shall be long enough to extend at least 75 mm (3 in.) outside the opening.

It would be some real work to fix it properly, but certainly less work than all that hacking up and stuffing. This electrician just didn't have confidence or experience. I would have got some 4" or 4-11/16" square metal boxes (coz that's what I work in), place them smartly to try to include 2 of the 3 cables with available length,then run new Romex to replace the third.

Take that second pic, one of the three cables goes straight down, I'd disassemble it to preserve every inch of that cable, have that cable make a back entry into a 4" square shallow box, then probably have to sacrifice the other two.

  • There was actually plenty of slack to do them proper. – Shane Dec 2 '17 at 23:24

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.