2

I live in a house that has decorative outdoor columns on our patio. Every year, for winter, I help my dad tie up the columns in a protective plastic wrapping. It usually takes all day Saturday, and after taking a year of Physics courses, I seriously started to doubt the reasons for why we were doing this operation every year in the fall.

The stated claim is that the columns should be covered to prevent water expansion which may lead to cracking them during winter. I can see a number of problems with this line of thinking. First, no one I can see has done this type of protection scheme with their columns, and I usually see them uncovered during winter. This, of course, isn't a sound logical reason to say therefore something is false, however I would hope that other owners of columns are knowledgeable in how to protect their infrastructure. The second is the physical and chemical mechanisms for how this is supposed to happen. Assuming no rain (For this example), microscopic sheets of water on columns freezing shouldn't be able to crack the column. (Or at least I would think so, the molecular situation often differs from what I would expect, especially when talking about lattices, where chemical and quantum interactions rule). Assuming rain, I would think that large drops of water would slide down the column instead of freezing, or, if they did freeze, they would do so on the surface, not harming the chemical lattice of the column.

Additionally, the columns' plastic wrapping is tight around the column, but it isn't airtight. I would think that airborne humidity will get into the space between the column and the plastic and somewhat defeat the purpose of the covering. (Diffusion down humidity concentration gradient)

Is such a practice normal? Is doing this helpful for the health of the columns? If so, are there better ways of going about doing this? (Annual coatings of some chemical to prevent water freezing/accumulating in certain places. Does the situation change if there are already existing small cracks in some of the columns?

Note: I'm uncertain of the chemical makeup of the columns.

Before After

migrated from skeptics.stackexchange.com Nov 2 '17 at 2:46

This question came from our site for scientific skepticism.

  • 1
    FWIW, while I was searching for some notability links to be able to save this question, I found an experiment on statues. – Oddthinking Nov 2 '17 at 1:37
  • 1
    the physics of the situation comes from the fact that the material (I doubt its actually ceramic btw) is porous and will absorb moisture. Over many freeze thaw cycles this can lead to cracking. I have no idea how critical this actually is. Note there might be sealants to do the job as well. – agentp Nov 2 '17 at 12:24
  • @agentp I believe that this meets the definition of ceramic (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceramic) – Sarah Szabo Nov 2 '17 at 15:26
  • I guess it doesn't matter what you call it, it is most likely porous and will eventually fall prey to freeze thaw damage. That said, I personally wouldn't worry that much about it unless it was of historic significance. – agentp Nov 2 '17 at 16:03
  • @agentp Reality is a little bit more complicated than that though. There are many subtle details here that could swing this discussion one way or another. What if its not as porous as you think? What if the size of the pores are very small? Molecular Hydrophobicity? You're probably right about not worrying about it though. I'm just curious if there is a trend of people doing things like this. – Sarah Szabo Nov 2 '17 at 20:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.