I'm installing some surge protection for a radio installation, and I have a somewhat unusual requirement of installing the surge protection device (SPD) at an Earth ground where the antenna feedline enters, which is about 100' from the main panel. This is because the antenna by virtue of its design must be grounded, it's not feasible to run the feedline to the existing electrical service ground, and so effective surge protection requires limiting the surge voltage at another ground location, where the feedline enters the house.

Many of the SPD I find have three wires: one for neutral, and one for each phase. The presumption seems to be they are installed at the main panel where neutral and ground are bonded.

In a previous question I was told there are SPDs with four wires, separating neutral and ground. Thus, they can limit the voltage between ground and neutral without requiring a direct connection between them away from the main panel, which would be hazardous. However, I need to protect only one, 120V, single-phase circuit. Using one of these four-wire SPDs, one of the wires would go unused.

I'm wondering, is it safe and permissible to use a 3-wire SPD (like the SDSA1175 I have in my hand) in this situation? The neutral connection would go to ground, one line connection to line, and the other line connection to neutral? Despite the naming clash, I can't imagine this is electrically different than the four-wire case, essentially a MOV between ground and each protected wire. Neutral isn't directly connected to ground, but in the event of a surge the MOV would clamp it within home hundreds of volts relative to ground.

  • I would leave the third wire unconnected and cap it. They should have an MOV between each hot wire and the neutral.
    – ArchonOSX
    Aug 8 '17 at 19:28
  • You would need to consult with the manufacturer as to your intended use. You cannot use a product contrary to its labeling or instructions. While you,'e talking to them, ask if their device is capable of the intended use; I remain super dubious of the usefulness of MOVs to suppress a hard lightning hit. Aug 8 '17 at 19:41
  • MOV's are what power stations use to suppress lighting strikes these are mush larger than a home version. Each hot leg has mov' s going to ground by installing both on the same leg you would be getting the total capability of the unit only using 1 leg would provide 1/2 the protection. I would double check with the mfg but the ones I have replaced modules on were direct from the hot to grounded & grounding conductors in the main panel.
    – Ed Beal
    Oct 23 '17 at 0:53

I've used that exact part exactly as you described before on a 30A commercial circuit without incident.

Now, do I know that it has protected equipment from surges? No. But No damage has occurred since its installation.

Do keep in mind, that one of the 'ready' lights won't come on, because each ready light depends on a separate hot having voltage potential between it and what it thinks is neutral. It's likewise not unrealistic to expect any faulty indicators to fail similarly. But the MOVs will do the same job regardless.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.