I have trouble understanding what's the point in cutting beam endings in order to make wood construction connections. Assume a connection of a 50mm x 50 mm beam (green) to a 100mm x 100mm beam (pink)

enter image description here

with a leaf connection (my translation for - I guess - the simplest wood construction connection consisting of removing half of the diameter of the beam and putting that part into the counterpart connection cut out). I imagine that the forces where the beams connect are the same as on the whole green beam, but the connection must obviously hold because those connections are used in construction, so why not make the beam only half the diameter large/do for the whole beam what works at the location of the connection?

I further assume that there's an impact of the connection cut-out/notch, but it'll be smaller than making only 50% of the bearing load usable (otherwise every wood construction would generally waste up to 50% of its material). How can I estimate this impact.

The leaf connection is used in this example in order to reduce the material which has to be removed from the pink beam.

This might all be not ideal and not true; it's a question to improve my understanding - I'm not the contractor building the schools for your kids.


You're overlooking a couple of important factors, starting with deflection. Smaller structural members will flex more than thicker ones, especially in the middle of the span. Sag also adds lateral loads to the connections at the end since it they must resist the pull of the shorter curved member.

Those connections are the second thing you've overlooked. You do need to fasten things together eventually and butt joinery puts all of the load on the fasteners. Generally two thirds of a beam is quite a bit stronger than two or three nails. It's worth noting that it's fairly common to use angle iron and bolts when the work will be covered up.

I suspect that notching wooden members in new construction is pretty much limited to timber frame buildings. It's getting harder to find solid wood beams than it used to be, and modern structural joinery tends to incorporate steel fasteners to protect against extreme weather events. For hurricanes or tornadoes you want the joint tied down; for earthquakes you want it to deform rather than snap.

Getting back to your original question, structural engineers have access to lots of data to work on the estimate. They can look up the strength of a given material, average weight of a building per story, strength of a given joint compared, etc. From there it's fairly straightforward physics.

Simulation is also a common tool. Once the plans are drawn in CAD you can specify the building and wind loads and get a detailed report on the expected performance. If you're really, really interested Autodesk Fusion 360 is free for hobby use and will let you run some simulations. You'd have to deal with the learning curve and it's not the right tool to design a building, but it'll do for mucking about with simple joints. (Alternately you might find just the tutorial video on simulation entertaining.)

Non-engineers generally rely on experience and rules of thumb (or the building code in these more enlightened times) and gratuitous over-building. Nobody would notch anything as small as you've got in your sketch. In the US they wouldn't be called "beams" either as they're too small. Joists would be at least 150mm thick and wooden beams 200mm or more.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.