Timeline for Is my plan for a 125A subpanel feeder ok?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16 at 16:44 | vote | accept | DaveMc | ||
| Jul 9 at 14:40 | history | edited | manassehkatz-Moving 2 Codidact | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 36 characters in body
|
| Jul 9 at 13:40 | comment | added | nobody | It should have been obvious to you that the form “Rule 4-0024” does not match the numbering used by the NEC (which uses the “100.2(A)(3)” style). “Rule 4-0024” is from the Canadian Electrical Code, which is 100% inapplicable to someone in Tennessee. -1 | |
| Jul 9 at 4:43 | comment | added | NoSparksPlease | I am confused about your neutral marking reference "rule (4-024)", how does NEC 200.6(B)(4) not apply? | |
| Jul 9 at 2:45 | history | edited | manassehkatz-Moving 2 Codidact | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 249 characters in body
|
| Jul 9 at 2:30 | history | answered | manassehkatz-Moving 2 Codidact | CC BY-SA 4.0 |