Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 11, 2020 at 0:53 comment added SteveSh The 328 foot limit for Ethernet connections is based on cable loss/attenuation. The higher the Enet data rate, the higher the frequency content of the signal and the greater the loss, per foot. Go look at the TIA-EIA-568 specification for building cabling.
Dec 10, 2020 at 21:28 comment added manassehkatz-Moving 2 Codidact @NateS. That sounds vaguely familiar. If indeed such distance issues matter, they wouldn't matter on the older stuff (one pair Tx, one pair Rx) but would matter in Gigabit.
Dec 10, 2020 at 21:00 comment added Nate S. IIRC the ethernet signal limit is based on skew -- each pair is twisted at a slightly different rate to minimize crosstalk, but this also means that each pair is a slightly different length. At short distances this doesn't matter, but once the cable gets long enough, the signals from the less twisted pairs start to arrive before the signal from the more-twisted ones, and it stops working.
Dec 10, 2020 at 17:36 comment added manassehkatz-Moving 2 Codidact Actually, to some degree it does. I've heard different things - and a quick search (on SE and elsewhere) yields conflicting results.
Dec 10, 2020 at 17:30 comment added Criticizing Israel not allowed "This is based on the way the Ethernet signal works" - elaborate? USB has a hard length limit based on the speed of light, but I don't think Ethernet relies on round-trip time delay like USB does.
S Dec 10, 2020 at 6:33 history mod moved comments to chat
S Dec 10, 2020 at 6:33 comment added Michael Karas Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
Dec 9, 2020 at 0:32 history edited manassehkatz-Moving 2 Codidact CC BY-SA 4.0
added 64 characters in body
Dec 9, 2020 at 0:22 history answered manassehkatz-Moving 2 Codidact CC BY-SA 4.0