Timeline for Should rooms be designed to minimize waste of sheet goods?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 14, 2020 at 12:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackDIY/status/1217053955869618176 | ||
Jan 12, 2020 at 15:25 | comment | added | Hot Licks | Do note that common drywall is incredibly cheap. | |
Jan 11, 2020 at 17:20 | comment | added | Fattie | it's incredibly difficult / probably impossible to size a room so that sheets "just fit". (think of the "overlapping edges" to begin with) . Saying that the room will be 4xN does not do it. More likely you will make it just miss which is a total PITA. It's just not a workable idea. It's simply wrong, it's not how building works. | |
Jan 10, 2020 at 16:54 | answer | added | fraxinus | timeline score: 3 | |
Jan 10, 2020 at 16:01 | history | edited | Yourguide | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 290 characters in body
|
Jan 10, 2020 at 15:35 | comment | added | Freiheit | Another thought - the problem you're trying to solve is fundamentally the same problem that pre-fab home builders have solved on a larger scale. When you're building one house at a time, the labor and planning to save a few sheet cuts is greater than the saved material cost. When you're building 100 houses in a quarter, that adds up. | |
Jan 10, 2020 at 15:35 | comment | added | Freiheit | You might also think of the problem the other way around. There are norms in homebuilding that have been around for decades or centuries and the building materials have changed to suit those norms. The examples I can think of are that there are plumbing and electrical fixtures that are perfectly sized to fit common framing sizes. | |
Jan 10, 2020 at 14:41 | history | edited | Machavity | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improved Formatting
|
Jan 10, 2020 at 0:23 | comment | added | Mazura | Material wastage is the builder's concern, provided you aren't trying to build an octagon house.... your concern should be maximizing the usable space once built. | |
Jan 10, 2020 at 0:21 | comment | added | Mazura | Is a hexagonal house feasible? | |
Jan 10, 2020 at 0:09 | history | became hot network question | |||
Jan 9, 2020 at 20:17 | answer | added | DMoore | timeline score: 19 | |
Jan 9, 2020 at 19:55 | vote | accept | Yourguide | ||
Jan 9, 2020 at 19:55 | comment | added | Yourguide | Agreed that the question is broad.... I am attempting to fine tune it... the answer by Greg Hill below has given me much to think about... and is the shove in the right direction for me. Thanks for responding! | |
Jan 9, 2020 at 19:50 | review | Close votes | |||
Jan 16, 2020 at 3:05 | |||||
Jan 9, 2020 at 19:01 | history | edited | isherwood | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
Jan 9, 2020 at 18:43 | comment | added | JPhi1618 | Large closets in every bedroom are great, and the size of large, open rooms that might require extra engineering will be more important considerations for cost than the rough size of bedrooms. This is a pretty broad question. | |
Jan 9, 2020 at 18:22 | answer | added | Greg Hill | timeline score: 53 | |
Jan 9, 2020 at 16:13 | history | edited | Yourguide | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
Jan 9, 2020 at 16:00 | review | First posts | |||
Jan 9, 2020 at 19:33 | |||||
Jan 9, 2020 at 16:00 | history | asked | Yourguide | CC BY-SA 4.0 |