Tell me more ×
Home Improvement Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for contractors and serious DIYers. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 13 down vote favorite

I need to change my smoke detectors but I don't know how to choose between ionization and photoelectric smoke alarms. I guess that there are pros and cons to choose one or the other. Should I buy a combination detector that uses both methods?

share|improve this question

3 Answers

up vote 10 down vote accepted

One consideration is where it's going to be installed.

The issue being that some places are more likely to have them go off when they shouldn't.

Ionizing can be affected by steam, so has problems if installed right outside a bathroom. They also don't work too well if mounted near moving air (forced air systems, ceiling fans, etc.)

Photoelectric are set off by lots of dust, so workshops, laundry rooms (lint) and the like are problem areas for them.

They both have problems in kitchens.

Where you can, you should use combination alarms, but you can also use a mix of types to achieve the same effect, while avoiding areas that might cause them to go off when they shouldn't.

share|improve this answer
Good points. You don't want to keep getting false alarms because then people become inclined to disable them altogether. – auujay Oct 7 '11 at 16:27
i presently have the problem that my smoke alarm set off when i use my bathroom. It is positioned just outside the room. I thougth it was because of its high age but you've just pointed the real problem. Its probably a unit with an ionization detector that is too near my bathroom! – Alexandre Jobin Oct 7 '11 at 17:24
up vote 5 down vote

I would go for a combination detector, or install one of each type. Each method detects different things:

Optical detect smoke and are better as detecting smouldering fires while ionization detect heat and smaller smoke particles. Ionization are more prone to false alarms than Optical.

The Wikipedia article states:

the National Fire Protection Agency recommend installing what are called combination alarms, which are alarms that either detect both heat and smoke, or use both the ionization and photoelectric / optical processes.

Which is a sentiment I agree with.

share|improve this answer
up vote 4 down vote

I just posted this on a different thread....but it is useful here also.

Ionization detectors are the most prevalent style installed in residences. This is largely due to a lower cost, but they aren't necessarily the best. They have more false positives (nuisance) alarms and are frequently removed or disabled, which does absolutely no good. We had a fatal cooking fire just last year because of this very phenomenon. Couple this with the fact that they take longer to alarm (up to 20+ minutes) in a smoldering fire, illustrates that you are better served by switching to either a dual sensor unit, or a photoelectric style for your home. Here is the text of an email I send out regularly on this subject.

Investigative news footage regarding different types of detectors- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnlkiZC0dd0 and http://youtu.be/cwl1biSvTiY

Interesting program from a father of a fire victim from the OSU fire tragedy in 2003- www.uc.edu/cas/firescience/forms/SmokeDetect.pdf (The first several slide are heartbreaking)

The first 10-15 minutes of this presentation is very informative- www.uc.edu/cas/firescience/Bennett/fire_detector_seminar.asx

Position paper from a State Fire prevention association- the Southwest Ohio Fire Safety Council ( www.uc.edu/cas/firescience/forms/SmokeDetectorsSOFSC5-10.pdf ) which recommends photoelectric detectors.

Do yourself a favor and install photoelectric, it may save your life.

share|improve this answer
Turned the URLs into links for you. Great information, thank you! – Karl Katzke Jan 19 '12 at 2:49

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.