Take the 2-minute tour ×
Home Improvement Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for contractors and serious DIYers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

There are reasons we are not interested in a vacuum cleaner at the moment. I'm sure the same applies for other people. Is there an alternative that can get rid of dirt as well as pick up bigger particles?

share|improve this question
4  
Please tell us why you don't want a vacuum. –  Jay Bazuzi Jul 30 '11 at 16:29
1  
If you don't want a vacuum because they exhaust particles, consider either one with a HEPA filter, or a central unit, where the exhaust is usually in a garage or to the outside. –  TomG Aug 1 '11 at 0:39
add comment

5 Answers

up vote 11 down vote accepted

Use a carpet sweeper.

image of carpet sweeper

Bissell sells several models of mechanical manual sweepers -- an invention that's been around in some form since the 1880s. They work, but only to an extent. For deep cleaning you'll have to use a vacuum or roll up your carpet and take it in to the pros.

share|improve this answer
    
I used one of these in the fast food place I worked in years ago. They work well and they are silent, so they can be used around customers. –  KeithB Aug 1 '11 at 20:53
    
@KeithB, can they be used to do deep cleaning on carpet? I guess not, because some kind of suction like vacuum has to be in place. Please correct me if I am wrong. –  TPR Aug 3 '11 at 11:05
    
Probably not deep cleaning, and they work best on carpet without a deep pile, like you usually find in commercial settings. –  KeithB Aug 3 '11 at 11:11
    
@KeithB, does it pick up bigger particles like crumbs etc? –  TPR Aug 5 '11 at 6:36
    
@progtick That it does. That was the main thing I used it for, picking up crumbs during the day. We also had a regular vacum that was used after closing. –  KeithB Aug 5 '11 at 15:25
show 2 more comments

In the "olden days" before there were vacuum cleaners you either swept (which still works to an extent -- tough bristles, short quick strokes are key) or took the carpet up and beat the dust and dirt out with a carpet beater (which also works, as long as your carpet isn't fitted).

Alternatively, there are machines that spray water and shampoo into the carpet and suck up the dirty water -- but these probably come under the heading of a "vacuum cleaner," and so aren't appropriate in your case. Also, they're not very useful for picking up bigger particles.

Beyond those options -- and keeping your carpet clean in the first place (Martha Stewart suggests lots of doormats) -- I don't think that there's another effective way of getting your carpet clean.

share|improve this answer
    
There is anecdotal medical evidence relating carpet cleaning fluids to Kawasaki disease in young children. And contrary to whatever you saw on "House", this disease is not exclusive to Asians. My otherwise healthy Caucasian son got it when he was 3. Treatment is 3 days in the hospital on a Γ-Globulin drip. –  Chris Cudmore Nov 16 '11 at 13:31
    
lpch.org/DiseaseHealthInfo/HealthLibrary/cardiac/kawasaki.html Ctrl-F for "carpet" -- Evidence is inconclusive. –  Chris Cudmore Nov 16 '11 at 14:32
add comment

Lint rollers work on clothes and hard surfaces, and certain products also work on carpets. Consider, for instance, something like this large sticky-tape roller, called the Roll-O-Vac.

Roll-O-Vac

For a thorough carpet clean, you'll have to use a plug-in machine or call in the pros.

share|improve this answer
1  
Definitely depends on the carpet. Your average loop-pile home carpet will be torn out by the roots, literally, with one of these. They'd be fine for low-pile commercial-grade carpet though. –  KeithS Aug 1 '11 at 22:50
add comment

Buy carpet squares. Then take carpet squares outside and beat them. Then throw them in the wash machine.

Don't know how doable for you this is (but I think I am the only person to actually answer the question fully). I have seen people get out stains in carpet squares through washing so why not the whole floor...

share|improve this answer
add comment

The purpose of carpet is two-fold. First, to make a nice, cushy surface for your delicate feet to tread upon. Second, as an insulating barrier from the extreme expressions of Maw Nature. The side-effect of carpet is a trap for disease, dead skin and all, plus an emitter of chemical emissions – a byproduct of materials used in the construction. The only logical resolution – to the chagrin of carpet manufacturers, is to rip it all out, insulate under the flooring and buy one of those wood floor sweeper-dusters as seen on TV. Hold out for the “wait, there is more” advertisements, best bang for the buck.

** ===== EDIT ===== **

As zero is a number, “you can’t” equally applies to “you cannot clean carpet without a vacuum.”

If you’ve never removed (ripped up and disposed of) carpet and/or padding in a regularly vacuumed environment, you are not qualified to answer, and especially not qualified to down-vote!! If you have removed carpet then you know, without a doubt, a vacuum of some type is essential to the maintaining a clean and healthy carpeted environment.

In the below diagram, please note the accumulation of dirt between the layers of the carpet, the padding and the flooring. These particles of dust (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dust) dead skin (http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/questions/question/1643/) and itsy bitsy creatures such as dust mites (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_dust_mite) are just some of the components of the yucky stuff labeled “filth and dirt” in the cheap artwork attached to this post.

enter image description here

The OP’s question is “There are reasons we are not interested in a vacuum cleaner at the moment. I'm sure the same applies for other people. Is there an alternative that can get rid of dirt as well as pick up bigger particles?”

I propose the following answer : “no.”

share|improve this answer
2  
This doesn't answer the question. –  DA01 Jul 18 '13 at 3:48
3  
It answers the question precisely, in that there is no answer to the question of thoroughly cleaning a carpet. –  JoeFromOzarks Jul 18 '13 at 3:59
    
Down voting because it doesn't answer the question. The question is specifically about alternative means to clean carpet, not alternatives to carpet. –  Steven Jul 18 '13 at 13:04
1  
The question is “What is an alternative to a vacuum cleaner for cleaning carpets?” My answer is “The only logical resolution – to the chagrin of carpet manufacturers, is to rip it all out…” and I stand by the answer. No vacuum cleaner? Not a (electric/mechanical) stand-alone, not a central unit, not a shop-vac with a 100ft hose? I think I’ll upvote ChrisF’s “took the carpet up and beat it using a carpet beater to knock the dust and dirt out,” because it’s the only applicable answer. (Afterwards, I’m heading to my garage-shop to develop a trash bag nanomites can use.)(grin) –  JoeFromOzarks Jul 18 '13 at 14:46
2  
analogous to asking how to bang one's head against a brick wall without it hurting. –  mike Jul 22 '13 at 4:15
show 2 more comments

protected by Steven Jul 18 '13 at 13:05

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.