Home Improvement Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for contractors and serious DIYers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Using my nifty thermal camera, I discovered that my furnace closet's combustion air duct (visible in this question) is getting really hot when the attic heats up, and then (being sheet metal) it radiates that heat into the furnace closet.

enter image description here

When this duct gets hot, it radiates heat into a drywalled, uninsulated stud wall and heats up the adjacent room:

enter image description here

I am already planning to insulate the wall cavity, but it also seems like if there's any place where a radiant barrier might work, it would be here: the duct is hot, but not actually touching the drywall surface that it is heating up. Does this sound sensible? Should I also cover the drywall with a radiant barrier to reduce the amount of heat it's absorbing in the first place?

share|improve this question
You could tape a strip of aluminum foil to a portion of the duct facing the attic and test again with your camera. – getterdun May 22 '14 at 1:11
Radiant barriers need an air gap to work (to give the heat a place to radiate to), so it would have to be taped to the drywall, not the duct itself. But yeah, I should probably give it a shot. – iLikeDirt May 22 '14 at 1:57
Aluminum has quite a low emissivity and high reflectivity in IR, so the camera will not tell you it's actual surface temperature unless it is taking these into account. You can test it by putting a piece of aluminum tape on a glass window: the tape will quickly be the same temperature as the glass, but will look much cooler. – ArgentoSapiens Jun 2 '14 at 17:28
up vote 0 down vote accepted

The answer is no. In order for a radiant barrier to be effective, it needs to absorb the heat but NOT be in contact with anything else. There's not enough room between the duct and the drywall to suspend a radiant barrier between them but touching neither of them. Instead, because it would have to be mounted to the drywall, it doesn't work, since it just gets hot and then conducts the heat right into the drywall--which is exactly what's happening now.

share|improve this answer
It sounds like you're addressing the conductive characteristic of a radiant barrier, when its purpose is to reflect radiant energy. Would it not offer the benefit of reflecting some of the heat? (Whatever energy it fails to reflect would, of course, have to be addressed by different insulation designed to control thermal energy conductance.) – feetwet Nov 13 '15 at 20:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.